{"data":{"id":"us-az/a.r.s.-44-619","jurisdiction":"us-az","citation":"A.R.S. § 44-619","heading":"Interstate matters","body":"A. Subject to subsection B of this section, an assignment made under the law of another state must be recognized and enforced on an issue if the result for the issue would be substantially similar to the result for the issue if the assignment had been made under this chapter.\n\nB. If a claim for wages, salaries or commissions or a claim of a governmental unit exists in another state, for the purpose of determining the priority of the claim under section 44-614, subsection E, paragraph 2, the assignee shall use the amount asserted or determined under the law of the other state.\n\nC. If an assignee determines that a creditor should receive the treatment the creditor would receive under an assignment made under the law of another state, the assignee may treat the creditor as the creditor would be treated in the other state.","path":["Title 44 Trade and Commerce"],"source_url":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/00619.htm","current_through":"57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session (effective 2027-01-01); mirror section count 24991","vintage":"2026-09-15","retrieved_at":"2026-09-26T04:29:04Z","sha256":"40ba8e173ef523c9c87acc8444bc270dcac4cb56cea2348b023caf5d8cdda6f8","source_id":"us-az","stale":false,"prev":"us-az/a.r.s.-44-618","next":"us-az/a.r.s.-44-620"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}