{"data":{"id":"us-mi/mich.-comp.-laws-600.1078","jurisdiction":"us-mi","citation":"Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.1078","heading":"Collection and maintenance of information.","body":"Sec. 1078.\n\nEach drug treatment court shall collect and provide data on each individual applicant and participant and the entire program as required by the state court administrative office.\n\nEach drug treatment court shall maintain files or databases on each individual applicant or referral who is denied or refused admission to the program, including the reasons for the denial or rejection, the criminal history of the applicant, the preadmission evaluation and assessment, and other demographic information as required by the state court administrative office.\n\nEach drug treatment court shall maintain files or databases on each individual participant in the program for review and evaluation as well as treatment, as directed by the state court administrative office. The information collected for evaluation purposes must include a minimum standard data set developed and specified by the state court administrative office. This information should be maintained in the court files or otherwise accessible by the courts and the state court administrative office and, as much as practicable, should include all of the following:\n\nLocation and contact information for each individual participant, both upon admission and termination or completion of the program for follow-up reviews, and third party contact information.\n\nSignificant transition point dates, including dates of referral, enrollment, new court orders, violations, detentions, changes in services or treatments provided, discharge for completion or termination, any provision of after-care, and after-program recidivism.\n\nThe individual's precipitating offenses and significant factual information, source of referral, and all drug treatment court evaluations and assessments.\n\nTreatments provided, including intensity of care or dosage, and their outcomes.\n\nOther services or opportunities provided to the individual and resulting use by the individual, such as education or employment and the participation of and outcome for that individual.\n\nReasons for discharge, completion, or termination of the program.\n\nAs directed by the state court administrative office, after an individual is discharged either upon completion or termination of the program, the drug treatment court should conduct, as much as practicable, follow-up contacts with and reviews of participants for key outcome indicators, such as drug use, recidivism, and employment, as frequently and for a period of time determined by the state court administrative office based upon the nature of the drug treatment court and the nature of the participant. These follow-up contacts and reviews of former participants are not extensions of the court's jurisdiction over the individuals.\n\nEach drug treatment court shall provide to the state court administrative office all information requested by the state court administrative office.\n\nWith the approval and at the discretion of the supreme court, the state court administrative office shall be responsible for evaluating and collecting data on the performance of drug treatment courts in this state as follows:\n\nThe state court administrative office shall provide an annual review of the performance of drug treatment courts in this state to the minority and majority party leaders in the senate and house of representatives, the state drug treatment court advisory board created under section 1082, the governor, and the supreme court.\n\nThe state court administrative office shall provide standards for drug treatment courts in this state including, but not limited to, developing a list of approved measurement instruments and indicators for data collection and evaluation. These standards must provide comparability between programs and their outcomes.\n\nThe state court administrative office's evaluation plans should include appropriate and scientifically valid research designs, which, as soon as practicable, should include the use of comparison and control groups.\ndeveloping a list of approved measurement instruments and indicators for data collection and evaluation. These standards must provide comparability between programs and their outcomes.\n\nThe state court administrative office's evaluation plans should include appropriate and scientifically valid research designs, which, as soon as practicable, should include the use of comparison and control groups.\n\nThe information collected under this section regarding individual applicants to drug treatment court programs for the purpose of application to that program and participants who have successfully completed drug treatment courts shall be exempt from disclosure under the freedom of information act, 1976 PA 442, MCL 15.231 to 15.246.","path":["MI Code","Chapter 600","Act Act-236-of-1961"],"source_url":"https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-600-1078","current_through":"2026-08-14","vintage":"open-us-law v2026.08, retrieved 2026-09-14","retrieved_at":"2026-09-14T18:32:31Z","sha256":"3abdff1cb01d119d65392048986aaad7c9eb66a38041e120606a9b3c2ef84526","source_id":"us-mi","stale":false,"prev":"us-mi/mich.-comp.-laws-600.1076","next":"us-mi/mich.-comp.-laws-600.1080"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}