{"data":{"id":"us-nv/nrs-1.4657","jurisdiction":"us-nv","citation":"NRS 1.4657","heading":"Required actions upon receipt of complaint; letter of caution.","body":"1. The Commission shall, in accordance with its procedural rules, examine each complaint that it receives to determine whether the complaint alleges objectively verifiable evidence from which a reasonable inference could be drawn that a judge committed misconduct or is incapacitated.\n2. If the Commission determines that a complaint does not contain such allegations, the Commission shall dismiss the complaint with or without a letter of caution. A letter of caution is not a form of discipline. The Commission may consider a letter of caution when deciding the appropriate action to be taken on a subsequent complaint against a judge unless the letter of caution is not relevant to the misconduct alleged in the subsequent complaint.\n3. If the Commission determines that a complaint does contain such allegations, the Commission shall authorize further investigation.","path":["TITLE 1 — STATE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT","CHAPTER 1 - JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT GENERALLY","COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE","Proceedings Concerning Disciplinary Action, Forfeiture of Office or Removal From Office"],"source_url":"https://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-001.html#NRS001Sec4657","current_through":"2025 session (NRS as revised 2026-08-25)","vintage":"","retrieved_at":"2026-09-03T05:51:29Z","sha256":"381be593095c66bc022101f17f68bf7be3a985c55d1363b75092eb5d1a7d74f3","source_id":"us-nv","stale":true,"prev":"us-nv/nrs-1.4656","next":"us-nv/nrs-1.466"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}