{"data":{"id":"us-nv/nrs-1.4667","jurisdiction":"us-nv","citation":"NRS 1.4667","heading":"Review of report of investigation; letter of caution; judge to respond to complaint under certain circumstances.","body":"1. The Commission shall review the report prepared pursuant to NRS 1.4663 to determine whether there is a reasonable probability that the evidence available for introduction at a formal hearing could clearly and convincingly establish grounds for disciplinary action against a judge.\n2. If the Commission determines that such a reasonable probability does not exist, the Commission shall dismiss the complaint with or without a letter of caution. The Commission may consider a letter of caution when deciding the appropriate action to be taken on a subsequent complaint against a judge unless the caution is not relevant to the misconduct alleged in the subsequent complaint.\n3. If the Commission determines that such a reasonable probability exists, the Commission shall require the judge to respond to the complaint in accordance with procedural rules adopted by the Commission.","path":["TITLE 1 — STATE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT","CHAPTER 1 - JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT GENERALLY","COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE","Proceedings Concerning Disciplinary Action, Forfeiture of Office or Removal From Office"],"source_url":"https://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-001.html#NRS001Sec4667","current_through":"2025 session (NRS as revised 2026-08-25)","vintage":"","retrieved_at":"2026-09-03T05:51:29Z","sha256":"3a4a1edc13fd92bffcf86b9f4aeb3082bdb53a0e667318d355420b9ec25c5f52","source_id":"us-nv","stale":true,"prev":"us-nv/nrs-1.4665","next":"us-nv/nrs-1.467"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}