{"data":{"id":"us-ok/okla.-stat.-tit.-63-63-2-432","jurisdiction":"us-ok","citation":"Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-2-432","heading":"Attachments of assets - Execution of judgment - Exempt","body":"property - Property seized by forfeiture.\n\nA. A plaintiff under the Drug Dealer Liability Act, subject to\n\nsubsection C of this section, may request an ex parte prejudgment\n\nattachment order from the court against all assets of a defendant\n\nsufficient to satisfy a potential award. If attachment is\n\ninstituted, a defendant is entitled to an immediate hearing.\n\nAttachment may be lifted if the defendant demonstrates that the\n\nassets will be available for a potential award of if the defendant\n\nposts a bond sufficient to cover a potential award.\n\nB. A person against whom a judgment has been rendered under the\n\nDrug Dealer Liability Act is not eligible to exempt any property, of\n\nwhatever kind, from process to levy or process to execute on the\n\njudgment.\n\nC. Any assets sought to satisfy a judgment under the Drug\n\nDealer Liability Act that are named in a forfeiture section or have\n\nbeen seized for forfeiture by any state or federal agency may not be\n\nused to satisfy a judgment unless and until the assets have been\n\nreleased following the conclusion of the forfeiture action or\n\nreleased by the agency that seized the assets.","path":["OK Code","Title 63"],"source_url":"https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os63.pdf","current_through":"2026-08-14","vintage":"open-us-law v2026.08, retrieved 2026-09-14","retrieved_at":"2026-09-14T18:32:36Z","sha256":"2389da13aa83387da4afb4ce31e2b237316145bd57bd9ab2f1f80a84ec577366","source_id":"us-ok","stale":false,"prev":"us-ok/okla.-stat.-tit.-63-63-2-431","next":"us-ok/okla.-stat.-tit.-63-63-2-433"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}