{"data":{"id":"us-ok/okla.-stat.-tit.-76-76-58.1","jurisdiction":"us-ok","citation":"Okla. Stat. tit. 76, § 76-58.1","heading":"Subsequent measures not admissible - Exceptions","body":"When, after an injury or harm allegedly caused by an event,\n\nmeasures are taken that, if taken previously, would have made the\n\ninjury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent\n\nmeasures is not admissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a\n\ndefect in a product, a defect in a product's design, or a need for a\n\nwarning or instruction. This rule does not require the exclusion of\n\nevidence of subsequent measures when offered for another purpose,\n\nsuch as proving ownership, control, or feasibility of precautionary\n\nmeasures, if controverted, or impeachment.","path":["OK Code","Title 76"],"source_url":"https://www.oklegislature.gov/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os76.pdf","current_through":"2026-08-14","vintage":"open-us-law v2026.08, retrieved 2026-09-14","retrieved_at":"2026-09-14T18:32:36Z","sha256":"25aa031664f7de316cf50b750a303675d132fca488cf9e82265136991369a28d","source_id":"us-ok","stale":false,"prev":"us-ok/okla.-stat.-tit.-76-76-57.2","next":"us-ok/okla.-stat.-tit.-76-76-5a"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}