{"data":{"id":"us-or/ors-14.175","jurisdiction":"us-or","citation":"ORS 14.175","heading":"Acts, policies or practices of public body capable of repetition and likely to evade judicial review.","body":"In any action in which a party alleges that an act, policy or practice of a public body, as defined in ORS 174.109, or of any officer, employee or agent of a public body, as defined in ORS 174.109, is unconstitutional or is otherwise contrary to law, the party may continue to prosecute the action and the court may issue a judgment on the validity of the challenged act, policy or practice even though the specific act, policy or practice giving rise to the action no longer has a practical effect on the party if the court determines that:\n      (1) The party had standing to commence the action;\n      (2) The act challenged by the party is capable of repetition, or the policy or practice challenged by the party continues in effect; and\n      (3) The challenged policy or practice, or similar acts, are likely to evade judicial review in the future. [2007 c.770 §1]\nDISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE","path":["01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure","2. Procedure in Civil Proceedings","Chapter 14 — Jurisdiction; Venue; Change of Judge"],"source_url":"https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors014.html","current_through":"2025 Edition","vintage":"","retrieved_at":"2026-09-03T23:50:10Z","sha256":"31fbe3a8b2ea11e4d6466d6e27cbdffcea92202a8d8e99e8abc01a0a47c860b5","source_id":"us-or","stale":false,"prev":"us-or/ors-14.170","next":"us-or/ors-14.210"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}