{"data":{"id":"us-or/ors-813.606","jurisdiction":"us-or","citation":"ORS 813.606","heading":"Exception for employee otherwise required to have device.","body":"Notwithstanding ORS 813.604, if a person is required, in the course and scope of the person’s employment, to operate a motor vehicle owned by the person’s employer, the person may operate that vehicle without installation of an ignition interlock device if:\n      (1) The employer has been notified:\n      (a) That the employee is operating with a hardship permit restricted as provided in ORS 813.604;\n      (b) That the employee is operating on a fully reinstated license within the first year following suspension or revocation for the employee’s first conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicants;\n      (c) That the employee is operating on a fully reinstated license within the second year following suspension or revocation for the employee’s second or subsequent conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicants; or\n      (d) That the employee has driving privileges and is otherwise required to install an ignition interlock device as a condition of a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement; and\n      (2) The employee has proof of the notification and, if applicable, a fully reinstated license in the possession of the employee while operating the employer’s vehicle in the course of employment.","path":["19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation","59. Oregon Vehicle Code","Chapter 813 — Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants"],"source_url":"https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors813.html","current_through":"2025 Edition","vintage":"","retrieved_at":"2026-09-03T23:50:18Z","sha256":"9d9f582dcac477f54db01c0918d84384d3e5bab4d25fcb4139c0e166250232e6","source_id":"us-or","stale":false,"prev":"us-or/ors-813.604","next":"us-or/ors-813.608"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}
