{"data":{"id":"us-va/9vac25-720-120","jurisdiction":"us-va","citation":"9VAC25-720-120","heading":"York River Basin","body":"A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).\n\nTMDL #\n\nStream Name\n\nTMDL Title\n\nCity/County\n\nWBID\n\nPollutant\n\nWLA1\n\nUnits\n\n1.\n\nLower Pamunkey River\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA\n\nHanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent\n\nF13R, F13E, F14R, F14E\n\nE. coli\n\n5.38E+13\n\ncfu/yr\n\n2.\n\nMiddle Pamunkey River\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA\n\nHanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent\n\nF12R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.36E+13\n\ncfu/yr\n\n3.\n\nTaylors Creek (VAN-F03R-01)\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA\n\nHanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent\n\nF03R\n\nE. coli\n\n3.66E+10\n\ncfu/yr\n\n4.\n\nNortheast Creek\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA\n\nHanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent\n\nF09R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.34E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n5.\n\nTotopotomoy Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Pamunkey River Basin\n\nHanover\n\nF13\n\nE. coli\n\n2.62E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n6.\n\nNewfound River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Pamunkey River Basin\n\nHanover\n\nF05\n\nE. coli\n\n2.89E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n7.\n\nSouth Anna River (VAN-F02R-01)\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA\n\nHanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent\n\nF01R, F02R\n\nE. coli\n\n7.50E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n8.\n\nSouth Anna River (VAN-F01R-01)\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA\n\nHanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent\n\nF01R\n\nE. coli\n\n4.92E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n9.\n\nSouth Anna River (VAP-F04R-01)\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA\n\nHanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent\n\nF03R, F04R\n\nE. coli\n\n7.74E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n10.\n\nSouth Anna River (VAP-F04R-02)\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA\n\nHanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent\n\nF04R\n\nE. coli\n\n6.02E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n11.\n\nAdams Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Poropotank River and Adams Creek\n\nGloucester\n\nF26\n\nFecal coliform\n\n4.48E+08\n\nMPN/day\n\n12.\n\nPoropotank River and Morris Bay\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Poropotank River and Adams Creek\n\nGloucester\n\nF26\n\nFecal coliform\n\n4.78E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n13.\n\nFelgates Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Queen Creek, King Creek, and Felgates Creek Watersheds\n\nYork\n\nF27\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.70E+10\n\nMPN/day\n\n14.\n\nKing Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Queen Creek, King Creek, and Felgates Creek Watersheds\n\nYork\n\nF27\n\nFecal coliform\n\n4.37E+10\n\nMPN/day\n\n15.\n\nQueen Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Queen Creek, King Creek, and Felgates Creek Watersheds\n\nYork, Williamsburg\n\nF26\n\nFecal coliform\n\n9.69E+11\n\nMPN/day\n\n16.\n\nPerrin River, upper\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Sarah Creek and Perrin River\n\nGloucester\n\nF27\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n17.\n\nSarah Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Sarah Creek and Perrin River\n\nGloucester\n\nF27\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n18.\n\nPlentiful Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for York River Basin\n\nSpotsylvania\n\nF07\n\nE. coli\n\n3.57E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n19.\n\nMountain Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for York River Basin\n\nOrange\n\nF06\n\nE. coli\n\n1.22E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n20.\n\nBeaver Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for York River Basin\n\nOrange\n\nF06\n\nE. coli\n\n1.25E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n21.\n\nTerrys Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for York River Basin\n\nOrange\n\nF07\n\nE. coli\n\n1.86E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n22.\n\nPamunkey Creek and Tomahawk Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for York River Basin\n\nOrange\n\nF07\n\nE. coli\n\n9.05E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n23.\n\nGoldmine Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for York River Basin\n\nLouisa\n\nF06\n\nE. coli\n\n1.09E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n24.\n\nLower Pamunkey River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds\n\nNew Kent, King William\n\nF14\n\nEnterococci\n\n1.34E+10\n\ncfu/day\n\n25.\n\nLower Mattaponi River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds\n\nKing and Queen, King William\n\nF24, F25\n\nEnterococci\n\n1.42E+10\n\ncfu/day\n\n26.\n\nUpper York River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds\n\nNew Kent, King William, King and Queen\n\nF14, F24, F25, F26\n\nEnterococci\n\n2.76E+10\n\ncfu/day\n\n27.\n\nUpper York River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds\n\nNew Kent, King William, King and Queen\n\nF14, F24, F25, F26\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.14E+12\n\ncounts/day\n\n28.\n\nTaskinas Creek\n\nTMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Ware Creek, Taskinas Creek, and Skimino Creek Bacterial Impairments\n\nJames City\n\nF26\n\nFecal coliform\n\n4.97E+08\n\nMPN/day\n\n29.\n\nSkimino Creek\n\nTMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Ware Creek, Taskinas Creek, and Skimino Creek Bacterial Impairments\n\nJames City\n\nF26\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.34E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n30.\n\nWare Creek\n\nTMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Ware Creek, Taskinas Creek, and Skimino Creek Bacterial Impairments\n\nJames City\n\nF26\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.36E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n31.\n\nAberdeen Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek\n\nGloucester\n\nF26\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n32.\n\nCarter Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek\n\nGloucester\n\nF27\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n33.\n\nCedarbush Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek\n\nGloucester\n\nF27\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n34.\n\nJones Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek\n\nGloucester\n\nF26\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n35.\n\nTimberneck Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek\n\nGloucester\n\nF27\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n36.\n\nUpper Little River\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA\n\nHanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent\n\nF11R, F10R\n\nE. coli\n\n5.61E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n37.\n\nUpper Pamunkey River and North Anna River\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA\n\nHanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent\n\nF12R, F09R\n\nE. coli\n\n3.25E+13\n\ncfu/yr\n\n38.\n\nBrock Run\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nSpotsylvania\n\nF15\n\nE. coli\n\n3.09E+10\n\ncfu/yr\n\n39.\n\nChapel Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nKing and Queen\n\nF21\n\nE. coli\n\n1.25E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n40.\n\nDoctors Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nCaroline\n\nF22\n\nE. coli\n\n3.24E+11\n\ncfu/yr\n\n41.\n\nGlady Run\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nSpotsylvania\n\nF16\n\nE. coli\n\n1.85E+11\n\ncfu/yr\n\n42.\n\nMaracossic Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nCaroline, King and Queen\n\nF22\n\nE. coli\n\n5.24E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n43.\n\nMat River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nSpotsylvania\n\nF18\n\nE. coli\n\n1.94E+11\n\ncfu/yr\n\n44.\n\nMatta River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nSpotsylvania, Caroline\n\nF18\n\nE. coli\n\n2.14E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n45.\n\nMattaponi River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nCaroline\n\nF17\n\nE. coli\n\n6.16E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n46.\n\nMotto River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nCaroline\n\nF19\n\nE. coli\n\n6.48E+10\n\ncfu/yr\n\n47.\n\nPo River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nSpotsylvania, Caroline\n\nF16\n\nE. coli\n\n1.46E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n48.\n\nPolecat Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nCaroline\n\nF20\n\nE. coli\n\n1.56E+11\n\ncfu/yr\n\n49.\n\nPoni River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nCaroline\n\nF17\n\nE. coli\n\n2.93E+12\n\ncfu/yr\n\n50.\n\nReedy Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nCaroline\n\nF21\n\nE. coli\n\n2.08E+11\n\ncfu/yr\n\n51.\n\nRoot Swamp\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed\n\nKing and Queen\n\nF22\n\nE. coli\n\n5.15E+11\n\ncfu/yr\n\n52.\n\nAylett Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing William\n\nF23R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.42E+11\n\ncounts/year\n\n53.\n\nCourthouse Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing and Queen\n\nF24R\n\nE. coli\n\n1.41E+11\n\ncounts/year\n\n54.\n\nDickeys Swamp\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing and Queen\n\nF23R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.22E+11\n\ncounts/year\n\n55.\n\nDogwood Fork\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing and Queen\n\nF23R\n\nE. coli\n\n1.79E+10\n\ncounts/year\n\n56.\n\nDorrell Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing William\n\nF21R\n\nE. coli\n\n5.75E+10\n\ncounts/year\n\n57.\n\nGarnetts Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing and Queen\n\nF23R\n\nE. coli\n\n8.72E+10\n\ncounts/year\n\n58.\n\nGravel Run\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing and Queen\n\nF21R\n\nE. coli\n\n1.10E+11\n\ncounts/year\n\n59.\n\nHerring Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing William\n\nF21R\n\nE. coli\n\n6.30E+11\n\ncounts/year\n\n60.\n\nMarket Swamp\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing and Queen\n\nF23R\n\nE. coli\n\n1.10E+11\n\ncounts/year\n\n61.\n\nMattaponi River (nontidal)\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing and Queen, King William\n\nF21R\n\nE. coli\n\n1.00E+12\n\ncounts/year\n\n62.\n\nMattaponi River (tidal)\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing and Queen, King William\n\nF23E\n\nE. coli\n\n1.87E+11\n\ncounts/year\n\n63.\n\nXDN-Garnetts Creek, unnamed tributary\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing and Queen\n\nF23R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.65E+10\n\ncounts/year\n\n64.\n\nXJG-Dickeys Swamp, unnamed tributary\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia\n\nKing and Queen\n\nF23R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.01E+10\n\ncounts/year\n\nNotes:\n\n1The total WLA can be increased prior to modification provided that DEQ tracks these changes for bacteria TMDLs where the permit is consistent with water quality standards for bacteria.\n\n2There were no point source dischargers in the modeled TMDL area.\n\nB. Stream segment classifications, effluent limitations including water quality based effluent limitations, and wasteload allocations.\n\nTABLE B1 -- RECOMMENDED STREAM SEGMENTS IN THE YORK RIVER BASIN\n\nSegment Number\n\nClassification\n\nName of River (Description)*\n\n8–1\n\nE.L.\n\nNorth Anna River (main and tributaries except Goldmine Creek and Contrary Creek) R.M. 68.4–0.0\n\n8–2\n\nE.L.\n\nGoldmine Creek\n\n8–3\n\nW.Q.\n\nContrary Creek (main only) R.M. 9.5–0.0\n\n8–4\n\nE.L.\n\nSouth Anna River (main and tributaries) R.M. 101.2–97.1\n\n8–5\n\nE.L.\n\nSouth Anna River (main only) R.M. 97.1–77.4\n\n8–6\n\nE.L.\n\nSouth Anna River (main and tributaries) R.M.77.4–0.0\n\n8–7\n\nE.L.\n\nPamunkey River (main and tributaries) R.M. 90.7–12.2\n\n8–8\n\nW.Q.\n\nPamunkey River (main only) R.M. 12.2–0.0\n\n8–9\n\nE.L.\n\nMattaponi River (main and tributaries) R.M.102.2–10.2\n\n8–10\n\nE.L.\n\nMattaponi River (main only) R.M.10.2–0.0\n\n8–11\n\nW.Q.\n\nYork River (main only) R.M. 30.4–22.4\n\n8–12\n\nE.L.\n\nYork River (main and tributaries except King Creek and Carter Creek) R.M. 22.4–0.0\n\n8–13\n\nE.L.\n\nCarter Creek (main and tributaries) R.M. 5.4–2.0\n\n8–14\n\nE.L.\n\nCarter Creek (main only) R.M. 2.0–0.0\n\n8–15\n\nE.L.\n\nKing Creek (main only) R.M. 5.6–0.0\n\n8–16\n\nW.Q.\n\nCondemned shellfish areas- Timberneck, Queens, and Sarah Creeks and portions of the main stream of the York River.\n\nNotes:\n\n*R.M.= River Mile, measured from the river mouth\n\nSource: Roy F. Western\n\nTABLE B2 -- WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS (IN LBS PER DAY)\n\nPOINT SOURCE\n\n1977 WASTELOAD2\n\nMAXIMUM7 DAILY LOAD\n\nRECOMMENDED ALLOCATION\n\nRAW WASTELOAD AT 1995\n\nREQUIRED \u0026 REMOVAL EFFICIENCY 1995\n\nCBOD5\n\nUBOD1\n\nCBOD5\n\nUBOD\n\nCBOD5\n\nUBOD\n\nPERCENT\n\nRESERVE\n\nCBOD5\n\nUBOD\n\nCBOD5\n\nUBOD\n\nGordonsville\n\n145\n\n398\n\n150\n\n412\n\n150\n\n412\n\n0\n\n1950\n\n2730\n\n92\n\n85\n\nLouisa-Mineral\n\n50\n\n108\n\n55\n\n118\n\n55\n\n118\n\n0\n\n850\n\n1150\n\n93\n\n90\n\nDoswell\n\n52\n\n110\n\n8628\n\n14078\n\n6908\n\n11258\n\n20\n\n1080\n\n1444\n\n854\n\n71\n\nThornburg\n\n63\n\n150\n\n68\n\n162\n\n68\n\n162\n\n0\n\n1240\n\n1690\n\n94\n\n90\n\nBowling Green\n\n27\n\n64\n\n29\n\n68\n\n29\n\n68\n\n0\n\n680\n\n926\n\n96\n\n93\n\nAshland\n\n160\n\n303\n\n235\n\n559\n\n188\n\n447\n\n20\n\n2250\n\n3825\n\n92\n\n88\n\nHanover (Regional STP)\n\n170\n\n437\n\n280\n\n820\n\n280\n\n820\n\n0\n\n5730\n\n7930\n\n96\n\n90\n\nChesapeake Corp.\n\n6400\n\n8000\n\n104455\n\n150005\n\n104455\n\n150005\n\nN/A\n\n51700\n\n64630\n\n90\n\n90\n\nWest Point\n\n105\n\n380\n\n2813\n\n1020\n\n225\n\n814\n\n20\n\n1000\n\n1600\n\n854\n\n66\n\nNotes:\n\n1BOD is Ultimate Biochemical Oxygen Demand. Its concentration is derived by the following: BOD5/0.80+ 4.5(TKN)=(UBOD). NOTE: The amount of TKN utilized depends on the location in the basin.\n\n2Projected for 1977 based on population projections.\n\n3Recommended allocation based on BPCTCA effluent guidelines applied to raw wasteloads at 2020.\n\n4Minimum removal efficiency.\n\n5Allocation based on BPCTCA effluent guidelines; amended by Minute 25, June 3-5, 1979 board meeting.\n\n7Assimilative capacity.\n\n8Amended by Minute 1, August 17, 1978, board meeting.\n\nSource: Roy F. Weston, Inc.\n\nC. Nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers. The following table presents nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations for the identified significant dischargers and the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the listed facilities.\n\nVirginia Waterbody ID\n\nDischarger Name\n\nVPDES Permit No.\n\nTotal Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)\n\nTotal Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)\n\nF20R\n\nCaroline County Regional WWTP\n\nVA0073504\n\n9,137\n\n609\n\nF01R\n\nGordonsville STP\n\nVA0021105\n\n17,177\n\n1,145\n\nF04R\n\nAshland WWTP\n\nVA0024899\n\n36,547\n\n2,436\n\nF09R\n\nDoswell WWTP\n\nVA0029521\n\n18,273\n\n1,218\n\nF09R\n\n819 Virginia LLC\n\nVA0029521\n\n47,328\n\n10,233\n\nF27E\n\nNutrient Offset Fund\n\nFormerly VA0003018\n\n167,128\n\n17,689\n\nF27E\n\nHRSD - York River STP\n\nVA0081311\n\n275,927\n\n228,4441\n\n18,395\n\nF14R\n\nParham Landing WWTP\n\nVA0088331\n\n36,547\n\n2,436\n\nF14E\n\nWestRock CP LLC - West Point\n\nVA0003115\n\n259,177\n\n56,038\n\nF12E\n\nTotopotomoy WWTP\n\nVA0089915\n\n182,734\n\n12,182\n\nF25E\n\nHRSD - West Point STP\n\nVA0075434\n\n10,964\n\n731\n\nTOTALS:\n\n1,060,939\n\n123,112\n\n1Effective January 1, 2026.","path":["Title 9. Environment","Agency 25. State Water Control Board","Chapter 720. Water Quality Management Planning Regulation"],"source_url":"https://law.lis.virginia.gov/admincode/title9/agency25/chapter720/section120/","current_through":"2026 Regular Session (effective July 1, 2026)","vintage":"","retrieved_at":"2026-09-14T04:49:22Z","sha256":"a4fb9765f901f7443109faede121e7754cf830ca6b68ab762046955b9ef6886e","source_id":"us-va-vac","stale":false,"prev":"us-va/9vac25-720-110","next":"us-va/9vac25-720-130"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}