{"data":{"id":"us-va/9vac25-720-130","jurisdiction":"us-va","citation":"9VAC25-720-130","heading":"New River Basin","body":"A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).\n\nTMDL #\n\nStream Name\n\nTMDL Title\n\nCity/County\n\nWBID\n\nPollutant\n\nWLA1\n\nUnits\n\n1.\n\nStroubles Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL for Stroubles Creek in Montgomery County,  Virginia\n\nMontgomery\n\nN22R\n\nSediment\n\n233.15\n\nT/YR\n\n2.\n\nBack Creek\n\nFecal Bacterial and General Standard Total Maximum Daily  Load Development for Back Creek Watershed, Pulaski County, VA\n\nPulaski\n\nN22R\n\nSediment\n\n0.28\n\nT/YR\n\n3.\n\nCrab Creek\n\nFecal Bacterial and General Standard Total Maximum Daily  Load Development for Crab Creek Watershed, Montgomery County, VA\n\nMontgomery\n\nN18R\n\nSediment\n\n77\n\nT/YR\n\n4.\n\nPeak Creek\n\nFecal Bacterial and General Standard Total Maximum Daily  Load Development for Peak Creek Watershed, Pulaski County, VA\n\nPulaski\n\nN17R\n\nCopper\n\n12\n\nKG/YR\n\n5.\n\nPeak Creek\n\nFecal Bacterial and General Standard Total Maximum Daily  Load Development for Peak Creek Watershed, Pulaski County, VA\n\nPulaski\n\nN17R\n\nZinc\n\n57\n\nKG/YR\n\n6.\n\nBluestone River\n\nFecal Bacterial and General Standard Total Maximum Daily  Load Development for Bluestone River\n\nTazewell\n\nN36R\n\nSediment\n\n116.2\n\nT/YR\n\n7.\n\nHunting Camp Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Hunting Camp  Creek Aquatic Life Use (Benthic) and E. coli (Bacteria) Impairments\n\nBland\n\nN31R\n\nSediment\n\n0\n\nLB/YR\n\n8.\n\nChestnut Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Chestnut Creek,  Fecal Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic)\n\nCarroll, Grayson\n\nN06R\n\nSediment\n\n18.9\n\nT/YR\n\n9.\n\nLaurel Fork\n\nBenthic TMDL for Laurel Fork, Sussex County, Virginia\n\nTazewell, Pocahontas\n\nN37R\n\nSediment\n\n21\n\nT/YR\n\n10.\n\nLittle River\n\nBacteria, Benthic, and Temperature Total Maximum Daily Loads  in the Little River Watershed of Floyd and Montgomery Counties, Virginia\n\nFloyd, Pulaski, Montgomery\n\nN19R, N21R\n\nSediment\n\n116.49\n\nT/YR\n\n11.\n\nBack Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load  Development for Back Creek\n\nPulaski\n\nN22\n\nE. coli\n\n2.61E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n12.\n\nBluestone River\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load  Development for Bluestone River\n\nTazewell\n\nN36\n\nE. coli\n\n9.41E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n13.\n\nChestnut Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Chestnut Creek  Fecal Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic)\n\nCarroll, Galax, Grayson\n\nN06\n\nE. coli\n\n1.74E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n14.\n\nCrab Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load  Development for Crab Creek\n\nMontgomery\n\nN18\n\nE. coli\n\n3.40E+08\n\ncfu/year\n\n15.\n\nCripple Creek #1\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for  Cripple Creek\n\nSmyth\n\nN09\n\nE. coli\n\n2.94E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n16.\n\nCripple Creek #2\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for  Cripple Creek\n\nSmyth, Wythe\n\nN09\n\nE. coli\n\n1.87E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n17.\n\nCripple Creek #3\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for  Cripple Creek\n\nSmyth, Wythe\n\nN09\n\nE. coli\n\n2.82E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n18.\n\nDodd Creek and tributaries\n\nFecal coliform TMDL for Dodd Creek Watershed\n\nFloyd\n\nN20\n\nFecal coliform\n\n6.91E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n19.\n\nElk Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Elk Creek\n\nGrayson\n\nN05\n\nE. coli\n\n1.48E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n20.\n\nHunting Camp Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Hunting Camp  Creek\n\nBland\n\nN31\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n21.\n\nLaurel Fork\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Laurel Fork Fecal  Bacteria, Dissolved Oxygen and General Standard (Benthic)\n\nTazewell\n\nN37\n\nE. coli\n\n8.72E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n22.\n\nLittle River and tributaries\n\nBacteria, Benthic, and Temperature Total Maximum Daily Loads  in the Little River Watershed\n\nFloyd, Montgomery\n\nN19, N20, N21\n\nE. coli\n\n1.13E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n23.\n\nDodd Creek, lower (DDD01)\n\nBacteria, Benthic, and Temperature Total Maximum Daily Loads  in the Little River Watershed\n\nFloyd\n\nN20\n\nTemperature\n\n0.82\n\nJ/m2/s\n\n24.\n\nWest Fork Dodd Creek (VAW-N20R_DDW01A02)\n\nBacteria, Benthic, and Temperature Total Maximum Daily Loads  in the Little River Watershed\n\nFloyd\n\nN20\n\nTemperature\n\n0.99\n\nJ/m2/s\n\n25.\n\nLittle River, upper (LRV03)\n\nBacteria, Benthic, and Temperature Total Maximum Daily Loads  in the Little River Watershed\n\nFloyd\n\nN19\n\nTemperature\n\n1.03\n\nJ/m2/s\n\n26.\n\nBig Indian Creek (VAW-N21R_BIC01A02)\n\nBacteria, Benthic, and Temperature Total Maximum Daily Loads  in the Little River Watershed\n\nFloyd\n\nN21\n\nTemperature\n\n1.2\n\nJ/m2/s\n\n27.\n\nDodd Creek, upper (DDD02)\n\nBacteria, Benthic, and Temperature Total Maximum Daily Loads  in the Little River Watershed\n\nFloyd\n\nN20\n\nTemperature\n\n1.3\n\nJ/m2/s\n\n28.\n\nPine Creek (VAW-N19R_PNC01A06)\n\nBacteria, Benthic, and Temperature Total Maximum Daily Loads  in the Little River Watershed\n\nFloyd\n\nN19\n\nTemperature\n\n1.35\n\nJ/m2/s\n\n29.\n\nLittle River, middle (LRV02)\n\nBacteria, Benthic, and Temperature Total Maximum Daily Loads  in the Little River Watershed\n\nFloyd\n\nN19\n\nTemperature\n\n1.44\n\nJ/m2/s\n\n30.\n\nLittle River, lower (LRV01)\n\nBacteria, Benthic, and Temperature Total Maximum Daily Loads  in the Little River Watershed\n\nFloyd, Montgomery\n\nN19, N20, N21\n\nTemperature\n\n1.66\n\nJ/m2/s\n\n31.\n\nMill Creek and tributaries\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL for Mill Creek Watershed\n\nMontgomery\n\nN21\n\nFecal coliform\n\n2.62E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n32.\n\nPeak Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load  Development for Peak Creek\n\nPulaski\n\nN17\n\nE. coli\n\n8.70E+08\n\ncfu/year\n\n33.\n\nMill Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN10\n\nE. coli\n\n6.79E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n34.\n\nTate Run\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN10\n\nE. coli\n\n7.99E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n35.\n\nStony Fork\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek,  Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek and  Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN10\n\nE. coli\n\n9.00E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n36.\n\nMiller Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN11\n\nE. coli\n\n2.63E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n37.\n\nReed Creek (VAS-N10R_RDC01B00)\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN10\n\nE. coli\n\n4.32E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n38.\n\nCove Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN12\n\nE. coli\n\n7.40E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n39.\n\nReed Creek (VAS-N10R_RDC01A02)\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN10\n\nE. coli\n\n8.71E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n40.\n\nReed Creek (VAS-N10R_RDC01A00)\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN10\n\nE. coli\n\n2.18E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n41.\n\nReed Creek, South Fork\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN10\n\nE. coli\n\n2.18E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n42.\n\nReed Creek (VAS-N11R_RDC01B00)\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN10, N11, N12\n\nE. coli\n\n3.80E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n43.\n\nReed Creek (VAS-N11R_RDC02B02)\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN10, N11, N12\n\nE. coli\n\n5.54E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n44.\n\nReed Creek (VAS-N11R_RDC03B04)\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill  Creek, Cove Creek, Miller Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, South Fork Reed Creek  and Reed Creek\n\nWythe\n\nN10, N11, N12\n\nE. coli\n\n6.03E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n45.\n\nEast Wilderness Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for East Wilderness Creek,  Kimberling Creek, Nobusiness Creek, Town Creek, and Walker Creek\n\nBland\n\nN26\n\nE. coli\n\n1.89E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n46.\n\nKimberling Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for East Wilderness Creek,  Kimberling Creek, Nobusiness Creek, Town Creek, and Walker Creek\n\nBland\n\nN26\n\nE. coli\n\n1.96E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n47.\n\nNobusiness Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for East Wilderness Creek,  Kimberling Creek, Nobusiness Creek, Town Creek, and Walker Creek\n\nBland, Giles\n\nN26\n\nE. coli\n\n1.38E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n48.\n\nTown Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for East Wilderness Creek,  Kimberling Creek, Nobusiness Creek, Town Creek, and Walker Creek\n\nBland\n\nN25\n\nE. coli\n\n1.73E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n49.\n\nWalker Creek segment 1\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for East Wilderness Creek,  Kimberling Creek, Nobusiness Creek, Town Creek, and Walker Creek\n\nBland\n\nN25\n\nE. coli\n\n2.70E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n50.\n\nWalker Creek segment 2\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for East Wilderness Creek,  Kimberling Creek, Nobusiness Creek, Town Creek, and Walker Creek\n\nBland\n\nN25\n\nE. coli\n\n3.45E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n51.\n\nWalker Creek segment 3\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for East Wilderness Creek,  Kimberling Creek, Nobusiness Creek, Town Creek, and Walker Creek\n\nBland\n\nN25\n\nE. coli\n\n3.10E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n52.\n\nWolf Creek headwaters\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for Wolf Creek and  Tributaries\n\nTazewell\n\nN30, N32, N33\n\nE. coli\n\n6.82E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n53.\n\nWolf Creek\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for Wolf Creek and  Tributaries\n\nTazewell, Bland, Giles\n\nN30\n\nE. coli\n\n1.14E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n54.\n\nReed Creek\n\nPCB TMDL Development for Reed Creek, the Upper New River,  Peak Creek, Walker Creek, Stony Creek, and the Lower New River\n\nRadford, Montgomery, Giles, Pulaski, Wythe\n\nN11R\n\nPCBs\n\n2,548.2\n\nmg/year\n\n55.\n\nUpper New River\n\nPCB TMDL Development for Reed Creek, the Upper New River,  Peak Creek, Walker Creek, Stony Creek, and the Lower New River\n\nRadford, Montgomery, Giles, Pulaski, Wythe\n\nN08R, N16R\n\nPCBs\n\n1,616.5\n\nmg/year\n\n56.\n\nPeak Creek\n\nPCB TMDL Development for Reed Creek, the Upper New River,  Peak Creek, Walker Creek, Stony Creek, and the Lower New River\n\nRadford, Montgomery, Giles, Pulaski, Wythe\n\nN17R\n\nPCBs\n\n345\n\nmg/year\n\n57.\n\nWalker Creek\n\nPCB TMDL Development for Reed Creek, the Upper New River,  Peak Creek, Walker Creek, Stony Creek, and the Lower New River\n\nRadford, Montgomery, Giles, Pulaski, Wythe\n\nN25R\n\nPCBs\n\n13.6\n\nmg/year\n\n58.\n\nStony Creek\n\nPCB TMDL Development for Reed Creek, the Upper New River,  Peak Creek, Walker Creek, Stony Creek, and the Lower New River\n\nRadford, Montgomery, Giles, Pulaski, Wythe\n\nN28R\n\nPCBs\n\n7,601.9\n\nmg/year\n\n59.\n\nLower New River\n\nPCB TMDL Development for Reed Creek, the Upper New River,  Peak Creek, Walker Creek, Stony Creek, and the Lower New River\n\nRadford, Montgomery, Giles, Pulaski, Wythe\n\nN18R, N22R, N23R, N24R, N29R, N35R\n\nPCBs\n\n38,868\n\nmg/year\n\nNotes:\n\n1The total WLA can be increased prior to modification provided  that DEQ tracks these changes for bacteria TMDLs where the permit is  consistent with water quality standards for bacteria.\n\nB. Non-TMDL wasteload allocations.\n\nWater Body\n\nPermit No.\n\nFacility Name\n\nReceiving Stream\n\nRiver Mile\n\nOutfall No.\n\nParameter Description\n\nWLA\n\nUnits WLA\n\nVAS-N11R\n\nVA0020281\n\nWytheville WWTP\n\nReed Creek\n\n25.79\n\n001\n\nBOD5\n\n360\n\nKG/D\n\nVAS-N15R\n\nVA0089443\n\nHillsville WWTP\n\nLittle Reed Island Creed\n\n25.12\n\n001\n\nCBOD5, JAN-MAY\n\n118\n\nKG/D\n\nCBOD5, JUN-DEC\n\n95\n\nKG/D\n\nVAW-N21R\n\nVA0024040\n\nMontgomery Co. PSA - Riner Town - Sewage Treatment  Plant\n\nMill Creek\n\n5.12\n\n001\n\nBOD5\n\n7.5\n\nKG/D\n\nTKN (N-KJEL)\n\n1.9\n\nKG/D\n\nVAW-N22R\n\nVA0060844\n\nBlacksburg VPI Sanitation Auth. - Lower Stroubles Creek  WWTP\n\nNew River\n\n71.37\n\n001\n\nBOD5\n\n818\n\nKG/D\n\nVAS-N36R\n\nVA0025054\n\nBluefield Westside WWTP\n\nBluestone River\n\n25.64\n\n001\n\nBOD5, JUN-NOV\n\n130\n\nKG/D\n\nBOD5, DEC-MAY\n\n260\n\nKG/D\n\nVAS-N36R\n\nVA0062561\n\nTazewell County PSA - Falls Mills Hales Bottom STP\n\nBluestone River\n\n22.49\n\n001\n\nBOD5\n\n5.5\n\nKG/D\n\nVAS-N37R\n\nVA0029602\n\nPocahontas STP\n\nLaurel Fork\n\n1.99\n\n001\n\nBOD5\n\n17\n\nKG/D\n\nVAW-N21R\n\nVA002040\n\nMontgomery Co. PSA - Riner Town - Sewage Treatment  Pant\n\nMill Creek\n\n5.12\n\n001\n\nBOD5\n\n7.5\n\nKG/D\n\nTKN (N-KJEL)\n\n1.9\n\nKG/D\n\nVAW-N22R\n\nVA0060844\n\nBlacksburg VPI Sanitation Auth. - Lower Stroubles Creek  WWTP\n\nNew River\n\n71.37\n\n001\n\nBOD5\n\n818\n\nKG/D","path":["Title 9. Environment","Agency 25. State Water Control Board","Chapter 720. Water Quality Management Planning Regulation"],"source_url":"https://law.lis.virginia.gov/admincode/title9/agency25/chapter720/section130/","current_through":"2026 Regular Session (effective July 1, 2026)","vintage":"","retrieved_at":"2026-09-14T04:49:22Z","sha256":"005a3c8a2d70b381678fac05e07070e551918a69ffe265ed469020d093a82bff","source_id":"us-va-vac","stale":false,"prev":"us-va/9vac25-720-120","next":"us-va/9vac25-740-10"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}