{"data":{"id":"us-va/9vac25-720-50","jurisdiction":"us-va","citation":"9VAC25-720-50","heading":"Potomac-Shenandoah River Basin","body":"A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).\n\nTMDL #\n\nStream Name\n\nTMDL Title\n\nCity/County\n\nWBID\n\nPollutant\n\nWLA1\n\nUnits\n\n1.\n\nMuddy Creek, Dry River, and tributaries to North River\n\nNitrate TMDL Development for Muddy Creek/Dry River, Virginia\n\nRockingham\n\nB21R, B22R\n\nNitrate\n\n49,389.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n2.\n\nBlacks Run\n\nRevision of the Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Developed for the Blacks Run and Cooks Creek Watershed Located in the City of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County\n\nRockingham, City of Harrisonburg\n\nB26R\n\nSediment\n\n1,310,000\n\nLB/YR\n\n3.\n\nCooks Creek\n\nRevision of the Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Developed for the Blacks Run and Cooks Creek Watershed Located in the City of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County\n\nRockingham\n\nB25R\n\nSediment\n\n1,543,000\n\nLB/YR\n\n4.\n\nCooks Creek\n\nRevision of the Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Developed for the Blacks Run and Cooks Creek Watershed Located in the City of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County\n\nRockingham\n\nB25R\n\nPhosphorus\n\n2,060\n\nLB/YR\n\n5.\n\nMuddy Creek\n\nTMDL Development for Muddy Creek and Holmans Creek, Virginia\n\nRockingham\n\nB22R\n\nSediment\n\n286,939.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n6.\n\nMuddy Creek\n\nTMDL Development for Muddy Creek and Holmans Creek, Virginia\n\nRockingham\n\nB22R\n\nPhosphorus\n\n38.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n7.\n\nHolmans Creek\n\nTMDL Development for Muddy Creek and Holmans Creek, Virginia\n\nRockingham, Shenandoah\n\nB45R\n\nSediment\n\n78,141.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n8.\n\nMill Creek\n\nTMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run\n\nRockingham\n\nB29R\n\nSediment\n\n276.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n9.\n\nMill Creek\n\nTMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run\n\nRockingham\n\nB29R\n\nPhosphorus\n\n116.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n10.\n\nPleasant Run\n\nTMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run\n\nRockingham\n\nB27R\n\nSediment\n\n0.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n11.\n\nPleasant Run\n\nTMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run\n\nRockingham\n\nB27R\n\nPhosphorus\n\n0.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n12.\n\nLinville Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Linville Creek: Bacteria and Benthic Impairments\n\nRockingham\n\nB46R\n\nSediment\n\n5.50\n\nTONS/YR\n\n13.\n\nQuail Run\n\nBenthic TMDL for Quail Run\n\nRockingham\n\nB35R\n\nAmmonia\n\n7,185.00\n\nKG/YR\n\n14.\n\nQuail Run\n\nBenthic TMDL for Quail Run\n\nRockingham\n\nB35R\n\nChlorine\n\n27.63\n\nKG/YR\n\n15.\n\nShenandoah River\n\nDevelopment of Shenandoah River PCB TMDL (South Fork and Main Stem)\n\nWarren, Clarke\n\nB41R B55R B57R B58R\n\nPCBs\n\n179.38\n\nG/YR\n\n16.\n\nShenandoah River\n\nDevelopment of Shenandoah River PCB TMDL (North Fork)\n\nWarren, Clarke\n\nB51R\n\nPCBs\n\n0.00\n\nG/YR\n\n17.\n\nShenandoah River\n\nDevelopment of Shenandoah River PCB TMDL (Main Stem)\n\nWarren, Clarke\n\nWV\n\nPCBs\n\n179.38\n\nG/YR\n\n18.\n\nCockran Spring\n\nBenthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins\n\nAugusta\n\nB10R\n\nOrganic solids\n\n1,556.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n19.\n\nLacey Spring\n\nBenthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins\n\nRockingham\n\nB47R\n\nOrganic solids\n\n680.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n20.\n\nOrndorff Spring\n\nBenthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins\n\nShenandoah\n\nB52R\n\nOrganic solids\n\n103.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n21.\n\nToms Brook\n\nBenthic TMDL for Toms Brook in Shenandoah County, Virginia\n\nShenandoah\n\nB50R\n\nSediment\n\n8.1\n\nT/YR\n\n22.\n\nGoose Creek\n\nBenthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed\n\nLoudoun, Fauquier\n\nA08R\n\nSediment\n\n1,587\n\nT/YR\n\n23.\n\nLittle River\n\nBenthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed\n\nLoudoun\n\nA08R\n\nSediment\n\n105\n\nT/YR\n\n24.\n\nChristians Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds, Augusta County, VA\n\nAugusta\n\nB14R\n\nSediment\n\n145\n\nT/YR\n\n25.\n\nMoffett Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds, Augusta County, VA\n\nAugusta\n\nB13R\n\nSediment\n\n0\n\nT/YR\n\n26.\n\nUpper Middle River\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds, Augusta County, VA\n\nAugusta\n\nB10R\n\nSediment\n\n1.355\n\nT/YR\n\n27.\n\nMossy Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Mossy Creek and Long Glade Run: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments\n\nRockingham\n\nB19R\n\nSediment\n\n0.04\n\nT/YR\n\n28.\n\nSmith Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Smith Creek\n\nRockingham, Shenandoah\n\nB47R\n\nSediment\n\n353,867\n\nLB/YR\n\n29.\n\nAbrams Creek\n\nOpequon Watershed TMDLs for Benthic Impairments: Abrams Creek and Lower Opequon Creek, Frederick and Clarke counties, Virginia\n\nFrederick\n\nB09R\n\nSediment\n\n478\n\nT/YR\n\n30.\n\nLower Opequon Creek\n\nOpequon Watershed TMDLs for Benthic Impairments: Abrams Creek and Lower Opequon Creek, Frederick and Clarke counties, Virginia\n\nFrederick, Clarke\n\nB09R\n\nSediment\n\n1,039\n\nT/YR\n\n31.\n\nMill Creek\n\nMill Creek Sediment TMDL for a Benthic Impairment, Shenandoah County, Virginia\n\nShenandoah\n\nB48R\n\nSediment\n\n0.9\n\nT/YR\n\n32.\n\nSouth Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for South Run, Virginia\n\nFauquier\n\nA19R\n\nPhosphorus\n\n0.038\n\nT/YR\n\n33.\n\nLewis Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic)\n\nAugusta\n\nB12R\n\nSediment\n\n40\n\nT/YR\n\n34.\n\nLewis Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic)\n\nAugusta\n\nB12R\n\nLead\n\n0\n\nKG/YR\n\n35.\n\nLewis Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic)\n\nAugusta\n\nB12R\n\nPAHs\n\n0\n\nKG/YR\n\n36.\n\nBull Run\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic)\n\nLoudoun, Fairfax, and Prince William Counties, and the Cities of Manassas and Manassas Park\n\nA23R-01\n\nSediment\n\n5,986.8\n\nT/TR\n\n37.\n\nPopes Head Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic)\n\nFairfax County and Fairfax City\n\nA23R-02\n\nSediment\n\n1,594.2\n\nT/YR\n\n38.\n\nAccotink Bay\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nFairfax\n\nA15R\n\nPCBs\n\n0.0992\n\nG/YR\n\n39.\n\nAquia Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nStafford\n\nA28E\n\nPCBs\n\n6.34\n\nG/YR\n\n40.\n\nBelmont Bay/\n\nOccoquan Bay\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nPrince William\n\nA25E\n\nPCBs\n\n0.409\n\nG/YR\n\n41.\n\nChopawamsic Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nPrince William\n\nA26E\n\nPCBs\n\n1.35\n\nG/YR\n\n42.\n\nCoan River\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34E\n\nPCBs\n\n0\n\nG/YR\n\n43.\n\nDogue Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nFairfax\n\nA14E\n\nPCBs\n\n20.2\n\nG/YR\n\n44.\n\nFourmile Run\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nArlington\n\nA12E\n\nPCBs\n\n11\n\nG/YR\n\n45.\n\nGunston Cove\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nFairfax\n\nA15E\n\nPCBs\n\n0.517\n\nG/YR\n\n46.\n\nHooff Run \u0026 Hunting Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nFairfax\n\nA13E\n\nPCBs\n\n36.8\n\nG/YR\n\n47.\n\nLittle Hunting Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nFairfax\n\nA14E\n\nPCBs\n\n10.1\n\nG/YR\n\n48.\n\nMonroe Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nFairfax\n\nA31E\n\nPCBs\n\n.0177\n\nG/YR\n\n49.\n\nNeabsco Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nPrince William\n\nA25E\n\nPCBs\n\n6.63\n\nG/YR\n\n50.\n\nOccoquan River\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nPrince William\n\nA25E\n\nPCBs\n\n2.86\n\nG/YR\n\n51.\n\nPohick Creek/Pohick Bay\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nFairfax\n\nA16E\n\nPCBs\n\n13.5\n\nG/YR\n\n52.\n\nPotomac Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nStafford\n\nA29E\n\nPCBs\n\n0.556\n\nG/YR\n\n53.\n\nPotomac River, Fairview Beach\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nKing George\n\nA29E\n\nPCBs\n\n0.0183\n\nG/YR\n\n54.\n\nPowells Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nPrince William\n\nA26R\n\nPCBs\n\n0.0675\n\nG/YR\n\n55.\n\nQuantico Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nPrince William\n\nA26R\n\nPCBs\n\n0.742\n\nG/YR\n\n56.\n\nUpper Machodoc Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries\n\nKing George\n\nA30E\n\nPCBs\n\n0.0883\n\nG/YR\n\n57.\n\nDifficult Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Difficult Run, Virginia\n\nFairfax\n\nA11R\n\nSediment\n\n3,663.2\n\nT/YR\n\n58.\n\n(Reserved)\n\n59.\n\n(Reserved)\n\n60.\n\nSouth River\n\nBacteria and Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for South River\n\nAugusta and Rockingham\n\nB32R\n\nSediment\n\n619.4\n\nT/YR\n\n61.\n\nSouth River\n\nBacteria and Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for South River\n\nAugusta and Rockingham\n\nB32R\n\nPhosphorus\n\n6,929.9\n\nKG/YR\n\n62.\n\nSouth River\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Mercury in the South River, South Fork Shenandoah River, and Shenandoah River, Virginia\n\nAugusta, Rockingham, Page, and Warren\n\nB32R\n\nMercury\n\n112\n\nG/YR\n\n63.\n\nSouth Fork Shenandoah River\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Mercury in the South River, South Fork Shenandoah River, and Shenandoah River, Virginia\n\nAugusta, Rockingham, Page, and Warren\n\nB32R, B33R\n\nMercury\n\n112\n\nG/YR\n\n64.\n\nShenandoah River\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Mercury in the South River, South Fork Shenandoah River, and Shenandoah River, Virginia\n\nAugusta, Rockingham, Page, and Warren\n\nB32R, B33R\n\nMercury\n\n112\n\nG/YR\n\n65.\n\nSpout Run\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed, Clarke County, Virginia\n\nClarke\n\nB57R\n\nSediment\n\n7.44\n\nT/YR\n\n66.\n\nWest Strait Creek\n\nBenthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek\n\nHighland\n\nB02R\n\nSediment\n\n0.02\n\nT/D\n\n67.\n\nWest Strait Creek\n\nBenthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek\n\nHighland\n\nB02R\n\nCBOD5\n\n11\n\nKG/D\n\n68.\n\nWest Strait Creek\n\nBenthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek\n\nHighland\n\nB02R\n\nDry season (June – December) ammonia as N\n\n1.6\n\nKG/D\n\n69.\n\nWest Strait Creek\n\nBenthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek\n\nHighland\n\nB02R\n\nWet season (January – May) ammonia as N\n\n2.9\n\nKG/D\n\n70.\n\nStrait Creek\n\nBenthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek\n\nHighland\n\nB02R\n\nSediment\n\n0.08\n\nT/D\n\n71.\n\nAccotink Creek, lower\n\nBacteria TMDL for the Lower Accotink Creek Watershed\n\nFairfax\n\nA15\n\nE. coli\n\n1.76E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n72.\n\nAccotink Creek\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL for Accotink Creek\n\nFairfax, Fairfax City\n\nA15\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.30E+14\n\ncfu/year\n\n73.\n\nBeaver Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Beaver Creek\n\nRockingham\n\nB18\n\nE. coli\n\n1.22E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n74.\n\nBlacks Run\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL for Blacks Run\n\nHarrisonburg\n\nB26\n\nFecal coliform\n\n5.52E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n75.\n\nNorth Fork Catoctin Creek\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments\n\nLoudoun\n\nA02\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n76.\n\nLower South Fork Catoctin Creek\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments\n\nLoudoun\n\nA02\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.60E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n77.\n\nUpper South Fork Catoctin Creek\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments\n\nLoudoun\n\nA02\n\nFecal coliform\n\n4.42E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n78.\n\nCatoctin Creek\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments\n\nLoudoun\n\nA02\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n79.\n\nLicking Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Cedar Run and Licking Run\n\nFauquier\n\nA17\n\nE. coli\n\n2.61E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n80.\n\nCedar Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Cedar Run and Licking Run\n\nPrince William, Fauquier\n\nA17, A18\n\nE. coli\n\n5.58E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n81.\n\nChristians Creek\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL for Christians Creek\n\nAugusta\n\nB14\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.18E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n82.\n\nCoan River (145G)\n\nCoan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n83.\n\nCoan River, Headly Cove (145H)\n\nCoan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n84.\n\nCoan River, Killneck Creek (145E)\n\nCoan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n85.\n\nCoan River, Stevens Point (145F)\n\nCoan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n86.\n\nMill Creek and the Coan River (145I)\n\nCoan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n87.\n\nThe Glebe (145D)\n\nCoan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n88.\n\nBridgeman Creek\n\nCod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n7.70E+08\n\nMPN/day\n\n89.\n\nCod Creek, east\n\nCod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n9.06E+08\n\nMPN/day\n\n90.\n\nRogers Creek\n\nCod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n9.83E+08\n\nMPN/day\n\n91.\n\nCod Creek, west\n\nCod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.53E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n92.\n\nPresley Creek\n\nCod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.63E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n93.\n\nHack Creek\n\nCod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.00E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n94.\n\nCubitt Creek\n\nCod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n4.25E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n95.\n\nHull Creek\n\nCod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.27E+10\n\nMPN/day\n\n96.\n\nCooks Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Cooks Creek\n\nRockingham, Harrisonburg\n\nB25, B26\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n97.\n\nCub Run\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for Cub Run\n\nRockingham\n\nB34\n\nE. coli\n\n1.74E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n98.\n\nDifficult Run\n\nBacteria TMDL for the Difficult Run Watershed\n\nFairfax\n\nA11\n\nE. coli\n\n9.86E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n99.\n\nDry River\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL for Dry River\n\nRockingham\n\nB20, B21, B22\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n100.\n\nFour Mile Run\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) Development for Four Mile Run\n\nArlington, Alexandria\n\nA12\n\nFecal coliform\n\n2.04E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n101.\n\nJackson Creek\n\nGardner, Jackson, and Bonum Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA33\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.44E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n102.\n\nGardner Creek\n\nGardner, Jackson, and Bonum Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA33\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.96E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n103.\n\nBonum Creek\n\nGardner, Jackson, and Bonum Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA33\n\nFecal coliform\n\n2.96E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n104.\n\nLittle River\n\nBacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed\n\nFauquier\n\nA08\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.38E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n105.\n\nSouth Fork Sycolin Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed\n\nLoudoun\n\nA08\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.41E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n106.\n\nSycolin Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed\n\nLoudoun\n\nA08\n\nFecal coliform\n\n2.79E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n107.\n\nCromwells Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed\n\nFauquier\n\nA05\n\nFecal coliform\n\n9.80E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n108.\n\nBeaverdam Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed\n\nLoudoun\n\nA07\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.21E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n109.\n\nNorth Fork Goose Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed\n\nLoudoun\n\nA06\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.11E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n110.\n\nGoose Creek and tributaries\n\nBacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed\n\nLoudoun, Fauquier\n\nA04, A05, A06, A07, A08\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.88E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n111.\n\nHawksbill Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Hawksbill Creek\n\nPage\n\nB39\n\nE. coli\n\n3.13E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n112.\n\nHogue Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Bacteria (E. coli) Impairment in Hogue Creek\n\nFrederick\n\nB06\n\nE. coli\n\n6.58E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n113.\n\nHolmans Creek\n\nFecal Coliform TMDL Development for Holmans Creek\n\nShenandoah\n\nB45\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.20E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n114.\n\nHolmes Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for the Hunting Creek, Cameron Run, and Holmes Run Watersheds\n\nFairfax, Alexandria, Falls Church\n\nA13\n\nE. coli\n\n8.38E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n115.\n\nCameron Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for the Hunting Creek, Cameron Run, and Holmes Run Watersheds\n\nFairfax, Alexandria, Falls Church\n\nA13\n\nE. coli\n\n1.33E+14\n\ncfu/year\n\n116.\n\nHunting Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for the Hunting Creek, Cameron Run, and Holmes Run Watersheds\n\nFairfax, Alexandria, Falls Church\n\nA13\n\nE. coli\n\n3.24E+14\n\ncfu/year\n\n117.\n\nLimestone Branch\n\nBacteria TMDL for Limestone Branch\n\nLoudoun\n\nA03\n\nE. coli\n\n5.83E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n118.\n\nLinville Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Linville Creek: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments\n\nRockingham\n\nB46\n\nE. coli\n\n1.10E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n119.\n\nBridge Creek (10-9X)\n\nLittle Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n120.\n\nLittle Wicomico River (10-19)\n\nLittle Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n121.\n\nLittle Wicomico River (10-20)\n\nLittle Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n122.\n\nLittle Wicomico River, Cod Creek (10-13.5Z)\n\nLittle Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA34\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n123.\n\nBranson Cove\n\nLower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\n4.11E+08\n\nMPN/day\n\n124.\n\nCabin Point Creek\n\nLower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.93E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n125.\n\nGlebe and Ames Creeks\n\nLower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\n2.13E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n126.\n\nLower Machodoc Creek\n\nLower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\n9.67E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n127.\n\nWeatherall Creek\n\nLower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\n9.95E+08\n\nMPN/day\n\n128.\n\nMattox Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mattox Creek\n\nWestmoreland, King George\n\nA31\n\nE. coli\n\n2.20E+06\n\ncfu/year\n\n129.\n\nMattox Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mattox Creek\n\nWestmoreland, King George\n\nA31\n\nEnterococci\n\n1.26E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n130.\n\nMattox Creek tidal (shellfish)\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mattox Creek\n\nWestmoreland, King George\n\nA31\n\nFecal coliform\n\n5.03E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n131.\n\nMoffett Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds\n\nAugusta\n\nB13\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n132.\n\nPolecat Draft\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds\n\nAugusta\n\nB15\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n133.\n\nLewis Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds\n\nStaunton\n\nB12\n\nE. coli\n\n3.48E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n134.\n\nUpper Middle River\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds\n\nAugusta\n\nB10, B11\n\nE. coli\n\n8.53E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n135.\n\nUpper South River\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds\n\nAugusta\n\nB30\n\nE. coli\n\n1.06E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n136.\n\nLower Middle River watershed\n\nFecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds\n\nAugusta, Staunton\n\nB10, B11, B12, B13, B14, B15\n\nE. coli\n\n1.24E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n137.\n\nMill Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development Mill Creek Bacteria (E. coli) Impairment\n\nPage\n\nB38\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n138.\n\nMill Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run\n\nRockingham\n\nB29\n\nTotal phosphorus\n\n116\n\nlbs/year\n\n139.\n\nMill Creek and tributaries\n\nFecal coliform TMDL for Mill Creek Watershed\n\nRockingham\n\nB29\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n140.\n\nMill Creek including unnamed tributary to Kissinger Millpond and Kissinger Millpond\n\nBacteria TMDL for (nontidal) Mill Creek including Un-named Tributary to Kissinger Millpond, and Kissinger Millpond\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA33\n\nE. coli\n\n5.91E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n141.\n\nMonroe Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Monroe Bay: Monroe Creek\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA31\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n142.\n\nMossy Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Mossy Creek and Long Glade Run: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments\n\nAugusta\n\nB19\n\nE. coli\n\n1.74E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n143.\n\nLong Glade Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Mossy Creek and Long Glade Run: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments\n\nAugusta\n\nB24\n\nE. coli\n\n5.23E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n144.\n\nMuddy Creek\n\nFecal coliform TMDL for Muddy Creek\n\nRockingham\n\nB22\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.04E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n145.\n\nNaked Creek\n\nFecal coliform TMDL for Naked Creek\n\nAugusta\n\nB28\n\nFecal coliform\n\n5.54E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n146.\n\nNeabsco Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL for Neabsco Creek\n\nPrince William\n\nA25\n\nE. coli\n\n1.27E+12\n\ncfu/day\n\n147.\n\nBarnes Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n148.\n\nBuckner Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n149.\n\nCold Harbor Bay\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n150.\n\nCurrioman Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n151.\n\nNomini Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n152.\n\nNorth Prong Buckner Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n153.\n\nPierce Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA32\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n154.\n\nMill Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek, Stony Creek, and the North Fork of the Shenandoah River\n\nShenandoah\n\nB48\n\nE. coli\n\n8.80E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n155.\n\nStony Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek, Stony Creek, and the North Fork of the Shenandoah River\n\nShenandoah\n\nB49\n\nE. coli\n\n4.42E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n156.\n\nNorth Fork Shenandoah River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek, Stony Creek, and the North Fork of the Shenandoah River\n\nFrederick, Rockingham, Shenandoah\n\nB42, B43, B44, B45, B46, B47, B48, B49, B50, B51, B52, B53, B54\n\nE. coli\n\n1.02E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n157.\n\nNorth River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for North River\n\nAugusta, Staunton, Rockingham, Harrisonburg\n\nB10, B11, B12, B13, B14, B15, B16, B17, B18, B19, B20, B21, B22, B23, B24, B25, B26, B27, B28, B29\n\nE. coli\n\n5.32E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n158.\n\nBroad Run (3) (VAN-A19R-05)\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River\n\nPrince William, Fauquier\n\nA19\n\nE. coli\n\n2.35E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n159.\n\nLittle Bull Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River\n\nPrince William\n\nA21\n\nE. coli\n\n3.29E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n160.\n\nBroad Run (2) (VAN-A19R-02)\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River\n\nFauquier\n\nA19\n\nE. coli\n\n1.36E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n161.\n\nOccoquan River\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River\n\nManassas, Fauquier, Prince William\n\nA17, A18, A19, A20\n\nE. coli\n\n2.29E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n162.\n\nSouth Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River\n\nFauquier\n\nA19\n\nE. coli\n\n4.32E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n163.\n\nBroad Run (1) (VAN-A19R-01)\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River\n\nFauquier\n\nA19\n\nE. coli\n\n5.84E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n164.\n\nPopes Head Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River\n\nFairfax\n\nA23\n\nE. coli\n\n7.12E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n165.\n\nKettle Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River\n\nPrince William\n\nA19\n\nE. coli\n\n8.30E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n166.\n\nBull Run\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River\n\nManassas Park, Prince William, Fairfax, Loudoun\n\nA21, A22, A23\n\nE. coli\n\n1.11E+14\n\ncfu/year\n\n167.\n\nAbrams Creek\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Abrams Creek and Upper and Lower Opequon Creek\n\nFrederick, Winchester\n\nB09\n\nE. coli\n\n3.10E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n168.\n\nUpper Opequon Creek watershed\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Abrams Creek and Upper and Lower Opequon Creek\n\nFrederick\n\nB08\n\nE. coli\n\n1.13E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n169.\n\nLower Opequon Creek watershed and tributaries\n\nBacteria TMDLs for Abrams Creek and Upper and Lower Opequon Creek\n\nFrederick, Clarke, Winchester\n\nB08, B09\n\nE. coli\n\n2.13E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n170.\n\nPiney Run\n\nBacteria TMDL for Piney Run\n\nLoudoun\n\nA01\n\nE. coli\n\n3.48E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n171.\n\nPleasant Run\n\nFecal coliform TMDL for Pleasant Run\n\nRockingham\n\nB27\n\nFecal coliform\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n172.\n\nPopes Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Mattox Creek to Currioman Bay\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA31\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n173.\n\nPotomac Run\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties\n\nStafford\n\nA29\n\nE. coli\n\n1.77E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n174.\n\nPotomac River, unnamed tributary\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties\n\nStafford\n\nA26\n\nE. coli\n\n3.92E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n175.\n\nChopawamsic Creek, North Branch\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties\n\nPrince William\n\nA26\n\nE. coli\n\n4.01E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n176.\n\nPotomac Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties\n\nStafford\n\nA29\n\nE. coli\n\n7.35E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n177.\n\nQuantico Creek, South Fork\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties\n\nPrince William\n\nA26\n\nE. coli\n\n1.09E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n178.\n\nAccokeek Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties\n\nStafford\n\nA29\n\nE. coli\n\n3.18E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n179.\n\nPowells Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties\n\nPrince William\n\nA26\n\nE. coli\n\n3.18E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n180.\n\nQuantico Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties\n\nPrince William\n\nA26\n\nE. coli\n\n3.75E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n181.\n\nAustin Run\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties\n\nStafford\n\nA28\n\nE. coli\n\n3.14E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n182.\n\nRosier Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL for Rosier Creek Watershed\n\nKing George\n\nA31\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n183.\n\nSmith Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for Smith Creek\n\nShenandoah, Rockingham\n\nB47\n\nE. coli\n\n8.53E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n184.\n\nSouth Fork Shenandoah River\n\nBacteria TMDL Development and Benthic Stressor Analysis for South Fork Shenandoah River\n\nAugusta, Staunton, Rockingham, Harrisonburg, Page, Warren, Waynesboro\n\nB10, B11, B12, B13, B14, B15, B16, B17, B18, B19, B20, B21, B22, B23, B24, B25, B26, B27, B28, B29, B30, B31, B32, B33, B34, B35, B36, B37, B38, B39, B40, B41\n\nE. coli\n\n1.43E+14\n\ncfu/year\n\n185.\n\nSouth River\n\nBacteria and Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for South River\n\nAugusta, Waynesboro\n\nB30, B31, B32\n\nE. coli\n\n1.13E+14\n\ncfu/year\n\n186.\n\nPage Brook\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Developments to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed\n\nClarke\n\nB57\n\nE. coli\n\n2.18E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n187.\n\nRoseville Run\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Developments to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed\n\nClarke\n\nB57\n\nE. coli\n\n3.05E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n188.\n\nSpout Run\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Developments to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed\n\nClarke\n\nB57\n\nE. coli\n\n5.22E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n189.\n\nMine Run\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run\n\nFairfax\n\nA11\n\nE. coli\n\n1.22E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n190.\n\nPimmit Run\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run\n\nArlington, Fairfax\n\nA12\n\nE. coli\n\n1.17E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n191.\n\nSugarland Run\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run\n\nFairfax\n\nA10\n\nE. coli\n\n4.78E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n192.\n\nTidal Four Mile Run\n\nBacteria TMDL for the Tidal Four Mile Run\n\nArlington, Alexandria\n\nA12\n\nE. coli\n\n1.42E+14\n\ncfu/year\n\n193.\n\nDeep Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Upper Machodoc Creek\n\nKing George\n\nA30\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n194.\n\nUpper Machodoc Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Upper Machodoc Creek\n\nKing George\n\nA30\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n195.\n\nWilliams Creek, Upper Machodoc Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Upper Machodoc Creek\n\nKing George\n\nA30\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n196.\n\nDungan Cove\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA33\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n197.\n\nHampton Hall Branch\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA33\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n198.\n\nLodge Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA33\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n199.\n\nMill Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River\n\nNorthumberland\n\nA33\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n200.\n\nWhite Point Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River\n\nWestmoreland\n\nA33\n\nFecal coliform\n\nN/A2\n\nMPN/day\n\n201.\n\nCrooked Run\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed\n\nFrederick, Warren\n\nB56R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.22E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n202.\n\nBorden Marsh Run\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed\n\nClarke, Warren\n\nB55R\n\nE.coli\n\n2.81E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n203.\n\nWillow Brook\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed\n\nWarren\n\nB55R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.33E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n204.\n\nWest Run\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed\n\nFrederick, Warren\n\nB56R\n\nE. coli\n\n5.80E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n205.\n\nLong Branch\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed\n\nClarke\n\nB57R\n\nE. coli\n\n1.73E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n206.\n\nStephens Run\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed\n\nFrederick\n\nB56R\n\nE. coli\n\n3.07E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n207.\n\nManassas Run\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed\n\nWarren\n\nB55R\n\nE. coli\n\n3.24E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n208.\n\nHappy Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed\n\nWarren\n\nB41R\n\nE. coli\n\n4.27E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n209.\n\nHappy Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed\n\nWarren\n\nB41R\n\nSediment\n\n29.05\n\ntons/year\n\n210.\n\nTurley Creek\n\nTMDLs for Turley Creek (sediment) and Long Meadow Run (sediment and nitrogen)\n\nRockingham\n\nB45\n\nSediment\n\n19.87\n\ntons/year\n\n211.\n\nLong Meadow Run\n\nTMDLs for Turley Creek (sediment) and Long Meadow Run (sediment and nitrogen)\n\nRockingham\n\nB45\n\nSediment\n\n27.92\n\ntons/year\n\n212.\n\nLong Meadow Run\n\nTMDLs for Turley Creek (sediment) and Long Meadow Run (sediment and nitrogen)\n\nRockingham\n\nB45\n\nNitrogen\n\n520.6\n\nlbs/year\n\n213.\n\nUpper Accotink Creek\n\nSediment TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia\n\nFairfax, Fairfax City\n\nA15\n\nSediment\n\n2,338\n\ntons/year\n\n214.\n\nLower Accotink Creek\n\nSediment TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia\n\nFairfax, Fairfax City\n\nA15\n\nSediment\n\n3,073\n\ntons/year\n\n215.\n\nLong Branch (central)\n\nSediment TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia\n\nFairfax, Fairfax City\n\nA15\n\nSediment\n\n936\n\ntons/year\n\n216.\n\nUpper Accotink Creek\n\nChloride TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia\n\nFairfax, Fairfax City\n\nA15\n\nChloride\n\n5,444,279\n\nlbs/year\n\n217.\n\nLower Accotink Creek\n\nChloride TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia\n\nFairfax, Fairfax City\n\nA15\n\nChloride\n\n3,723,479\n\nlbs/year\n\n218.\n\nLong Branch (central)\n\nChloride TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia\n\nFairfax, Fairfax City\n\nA15\n\nChloride\n\n873,049\n\nlbs/year\n\n219.\n\nNorth Fork Catoctin Creek\n\nA TMDL and Watershed Management Plan to Address Sediment in North Fork Catoctin Creek Located in Loudoun County, Virginia\n\nLoudoun\n\nA02R\n\nSediment\n\n99.1\n\ntons/year\n\n220.\n\nLewis Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, Staunton, Virginia\n\nStaunton\n\nB12R\n\nPCBs\n\n3,040\n\nmg/yr\n\n221.\n\nCrooked Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Stony Creek and Pughs Run Located in Shenandoah County, Virginia\n\nShenandoah\n\nB48R\n\nSediment\n\n12,291\n\nlbs/year\n\n222.\n\nStony Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Stony Creek and Pughs Run Located in Shenandoah County, Virginia\n\nShenandoah\n\nB49R\n\nSediment\n\n431,000\n\nlbs/year\n\n223.\n\nPughs Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Stony Creek and Pughs Run Located in Shenandoah County, Virginia\n\nShenandoah\n\nB50R\n\nSediment\n\n22,960\n\nlbs/year\n\nNotes:\n\n1The total WLA can be increased prior to modification provided that DEQ tracks these changes for bacteria TMDLs where the permit is consistent with water quality standards for bacteria.\n\n2There were no point source dischargers in the modeled TMDL area.\n\nB. Non-TMDL wasteload allocations.\n\nWater Body\n\nPermit No.\n\nFacility Name\n\nOutfall No.\n\nReceiving Stream\n\nRiver Mile\n\nParameter Description\n\nWLA\n\nUnits WLA\n\nVAV-B02R\n\nVA0023281\n\nMonterey STP\n\n001\n\nWest Strait Creek\n\n3.85\n\nCBOD5\n\n11.4\n\nKG/D\n\nVAV-B08R\n\nVA0065552\n\nOpequon Water Reclamation Facility\n\n001\n\nOpequon Creek\n\n32.66\n\nBOD5, JUN-NOV\n\n207\n\nKG/D\n\nAKA Winchester - Frederick Regional\n\nCBOD5, DEC-MAY\n\n1514\n\nKG/D\n\nVAV-B14R\n\nVA0025291\n\nFishersville Regional STP\n\n001\n\nChristians Creek\n\n12.36\n\nBOD5\n\n182\n\nKG/D\n\nVAV-B23R\n\nVA0060640\n\nNorth River WWTF AKA Harrisonburg - Rockingham Reg. Sewer Auth.\n\n001\n\nNorth River\n\n15.01\n\nCBOD5, JAN-MAY\n\n700\n\nKG/D\n\nCBOD5, JUN-DEC\n\n800\n\nTKN, JUN-DEC\n\n420\n\nTKN, JAN-MAY\n\n850\n\nVAV-B32R\n\nVA0002160\n\nINVISTA - Waynesboro Formerly Dupont - Waynesboro\n\n001\n\nSouth River\n\n25.3\n\nBOD5\n\n272\n\nKG/D\n\nVAV-B32R\n\nVA0025151\n\nWaynesboro STP\n\n001\n\nSouth River\n\n23.54\n\nCBOD5\n\n227\n\nKG/D\n\nCBOD5, JUN-OCT\n\n113.6\n\nKG/D\n\nVAV-B32R\n\nVA0028037\n\nSkyline Swannanoa STP\n\n001\n\nSouth River UT\n\n2.96\n\nBOD5\n\n8.5\n\nKG/D\n\nVAV-B35R\n\nVA0024732\n\nMassanutten Public Service STP\n\n001\n\nQuail Run\n\n5.07\n\nBOD5\n\n75.7\n\nKG/D\n\nVAV-B37R\n\nVA0002178\n\nMerck \u0026 Company\n\n001\n\nS.F. Shenandoah River\n\n88.09\n\nBOD5\n\n1570\n\nKG/D\n\nAMMONIA, AS N\n\n645.9\n\nKG/D\n\nVAV-B49R\n\nVA0028380\n\nStoney Creek Sanitary District STP\n\n001\n\nStoney Creek\n\n19.87\n\nBOD5, JUN-NOV\n\n29.5\n\nKG/D\n\nVAV-B53R\n\nVA0020982\n\nMiddletown STP\n\n001\n\nMeadow Brook\n\n2.19\n\nCBOD5\n\n24.0\n\nKG/D\n\nVAV-B58R\n\nVA0020532\n\nBerryville STP\n\n001\n\nShenandoah River\n\n24.23\n\nCBOD5\n\n42.6\n\nKG/D\n\nC. Nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers. The following table presents nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations for the identified significant dischargers and the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the listed facilities.\n\nVirginia Waterbody ID\n\nDischarger Name\n\nVPDES Permit No.\n\nTotal Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)\n\nTotal Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)\n\nB37R\n\nMolson Coors - Shenandoah Brewery\n\nVA0073245\n\n54,820\n\n4,112\n\nB14R\n\nACSA - Fishersville Regional WWTP\n\nVA0025291\n\n48,729\n\n3,655\n\nB32R\n\nThe Lycra Company (Outfall 101)\n\nVA0002160\n\n78,941\n\n1,009\n\nB39R\n\nLuray WWTP\n\nVA0062642\n\n19,492\n\n1,462\n\nB35R\n\nMassanutten Public Service Corporation STP\n\nVA0024732\n\n18,273\n\n1,371\n\nB37R\n\nMerck Sharp \u0026 Dohme Corp. - Elkton Plant (Outfall 101)\n\nVA0002178\n\n43,835\n\n4,384\n\nB12R\n\nACSA - Middle River Regional WWTP\n\nVA0064793\n\n82,839\n\n6,213\n\nB23R\n\nNorth River WWTF 1\n\nVA0060640\n\n260,226\n\n19,574\n\nB22R\n\nVPGC, LLC - Hinton\n\nVA0002313\n\n27,410\n\n1,371\n\nB38R\n\nNutrient Offset Fund\n\nFormerly VA0001961\n\n18,273\n\n914\n\nB31R\n\nACSA - Stuarts Draft WWTP\n\nVA0066877\n\n48,729\n\n3,655\n\nB32R\n\nWaynesboro WWTP\n\nVA0025151\n\n48,729\n\n3,655\n\nB23R\n\nACSA - Weyers Cave WWTP\n\nVA0022349\n\n6,091\n\n457\n\nB58R\n\nBerryville WWTP\n\nVA0020532\n\n8,528\n\n640\n\nB55R\n\nFront Royal WWTP\n\nVA0062812\n\n48,729\n\n3,655\n\nB49R\n\nGeorges Chicken LLC\n\nVA0077402\n\n31,065\n\n1,553\n\nB48R\n\nMt. Jackson STP\n\nVA0026441\n\n8,528\n\n640\n\nB45R\n\nBroadway Regional WWTF\n\nVA0090263\n\n29,481\n\n2,211\n\nB49R\n\nStoney Creek SD STP\n\nVA0028380\n\n7,309\n\n548\n\nB51R\n\nStrasburg STP\n\nVA0020311\n\n11,939\n\n895\n\nB50R\n\nWoodstock STP\n\nVA0026468\n\n24,364\n\n1,827\n\nA06R\n\nBasham Simms WWTF\n\nVA0022802\n\n18,273\n\n1,371\n\nA09R\n\nBroad Run WRF\n\nVA0091383\n\n134,005\n\n3,350\n\nA08R\n\nLeesburg WPCF\n\nVA0092282\n\n121,822\n\n9,137\n\nA06R\n\nRound Hill Town WWTP\n\nVA0026212\n\n9,137\n\n685\n\nA25R\n\nVA American Water Prince William - Section 1 WWTF\n\nVA0024724\n\n42,029\n\n2,522\n\nA25R\n\nVA American Water Prince William - Section 8 WWTF\n\nVA0024678\n\n42,029\n\n2,522\n\nA25E\n\nH L Mooney WWTF\n\nVA0025101\n\n219,280\n\n13,157\n\nA22R\n\nUOSA - Centreville\n\nVA0024988\n\n1,315,682\n\n16,446\n\nA19R\n\nVint Hill WWTP\n\nVA0020460\n\n11,573\n\n868\n\nB08R\n\nOpequon WRF 2  ]\n\nVA0065552\n\n121,851\n\n11,512\n\nB08R\n\nParkins Mill WWTF\n\nVA0075191\n\n60,911\n\n4,568\n\nA13E\n\nAlexandria Renew Enterprises WWTP 3\n\nVA0025160\n\n493,381\n\n29,603\n\nA12E\n\nArlington County Water PCF\n\nVA0025143\n\n365,467\n\n21,928\n\nA16R\n\nNoman M Cole Jr PCP\n\nVA0025364\n\n612,158\n\n36,729\n\nA12R\n\nBlue Plains (VA Share)\n\nDC0021199\n\n581,458\n\n26,166\n\nA26R\n\nUSMC Quantico Mainside STP\n\nVA0028363\n\n20,101\n\n1,206\n\nA28R\n\nAquia WWTP\n\nVA0060968\n\n73,093\n\n4,386\n\nA31E\n\nColonial Beach WWTP\n\nVA0026409\n\n18,273\n\n1,827\n\nA30E\n\nKGCSA - Dahlgren District WWTP\n\nVA0026514\n\n9,137\n\n914\n\nA29E\n\nKGCSA - Fairview Beach WWTP\n\nVA0092134\n\n1,827\n\n183\n\nA30E\n\nNaval Support Facility Dahlgren\n\nVA0021067\n\n6,578\n\n658\n\nA31R\n\nKGCSA - Purkins Corner WWTP\n\nVA0070106\n\n1,096\n\n110\n\nNutrient Offset Fund\n\n9,137\n\n685\n\nTOTALS:\n\n5,214,628\n\n254,334\n\nNotes:\n\n1 North River WWTF WLA includes 6,835 lbs/yr of TN and 570 lbs/yr of TP from the consolidation of the McGaheysville STP (VA0072931).\n\n2 Opequan WRF: (a) the TN WLA is derived based on 3 mg/l of TN and 12.6 MGD; (b) the TN WLA includes an additional allocation for TN in the amount of 6,729 lbs/yr by means of a landfill leachate consolidation and treatment project; and (c) the TP WLA is derived based on 0.3 mg/l of TP and 12.6 MGD.\n\n3 Wasteload allocations for localities served by combined sewers are based on dry weather design flow capacity. During wet weather flow events the discharge shall achieve a TN concentration of 4.0 mg/l and TP concentration of 0.18 mg/l.","path":["Title 9. Environment","Agency 25. State Water Control Board","Chapter 720. Water Quality Management Planning Regulation"],"source_url":"https://law.lis.virginia.gov/admincode/title9/agency25/chapter720/section50/","current_through":"2026 Regular Session (effective July 1, 2026)","vintage":"","retrieved_at":"2026-09-14T04:49:22Z","sha256":"c34d3b49803580775bd43ebe7f95c4d7952fc57be60d0a89bd5cf096781c94df","source_id":"us-va-vac","stale":false,"prev":"us-va/9vac25-720-40","next":"us-va/9vac25-720-60"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}