{"data":{"id":"us-va/9vac25-720-60","jurisdiction":"us-va","citation":"9VAC25-720-60","heading":"James River Basin","body":"A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).\n\nTMDL #\n\nStream Name\n\nTMDL Title\n\nCity/County\n\nWBID\n\nPollutant\n\nWLA1\n\nUnits\n\n1.\n\nPheasanty Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins\n\nBath\n\nI14R\n\nOrganic solids\n\n1,231.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n2.\n\nWallace Mill Stream\n\nBenthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins\n\nAugusta\n\nI32R\n\nOrganic solids\n\n2,814.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n3.\n\nMontebello Sp. Branch\n\nBenthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins\n\nNelson\n\nH09R\n\nOrganic solids\n\n37.00\n\nLB/YR\n\n4.\n\nUnnamed tributary to Deep Creek\n\nGeneral Standard Total Maximum Daily Load for Unnamed Tributary to Deep Creek\n\nNottoway\n\nJ11R\n\nRaw sewage\n\n0\n\nGAL/YR\n\n5.\n\nUnnamed tributary to Chickahominy River\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Unnamed Tributary to the Chickahominy River\n\nHanover\n\nG05R\n\nTotal phosphorus\n\n409.35\n\nLB/YR\n\n6.\n\nRivanna River\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Watershed\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Nelson, Orange\n\nH27R,\n\nH28R\n\nSediment\n\n10,229\n\nLbs/Day\n\n7.\n\nJackson River\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the Jackson River, Virginia\n\nAlleghany, Bath, Highland\n\nI04R, I09R\n\nTotal phosphorus\n\n72,955\n\nLB/GS2\n\n8.\n\nJackson River\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the Jackson River, Virginia\n\nAlleghany, Bath, Highland\n\nI04R, I09R\n\nTotal nitrogen\n\n220,134\n\nLB/GS\n\n9.\n\nLittle Calfpasture\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development to Address a Benthic Impairment in the Little Calfpasture River, Rockbridge County, Virginia\n\nRockbridge\n\n132R\n\nSediment\n\n30.4\n\nT/YR\n\n10.\n\nPhelps Branch\n\nPhelps Branch Sediment TMDL Development Report for a Benthic Impairment in Appomattox County, Virginia\n\nAppomattox\n\nH06R\n\nSediment\n\n115.7\n\nT/YR\n\n11.\n\nLong Branch\n\nSediment TMDL Development Report for Benthic Impairments in Long Branch and Buffalo River in Amherst County, Virginia\n\nAmherst\n\nH11R\n\nSediment\n\n16.2\n\nT/YR\n\n12.\n\nBuffalo River\n\nSediment TMDL Development Report for Benthic Impairments in Long Branch and Buffalo River in Amherst County, Virginia\n\nAmherst\n\nH11R\n\nSediment\n\n306.4\n\nT/YR\n\n13.\n\nChickahominy River\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Chickahominy River, Virginia\n\nHanover, Henrico\n\nG05R\n\nSediment\n\n294.03\n\nT/YR\n\n14.\n\nColliers Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River, and Cedar Creek and a Sediment TMDL Development for Colliers Creek\n\nRockbridge\n\n138R\n\nSediment\n\n103.4\n\nT/YR\n\n15.\n\nAngola Creek (1) - VAC-J06R_ANG01A00\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nCumberland\n\nJ06\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n16.\n\nAngola Creek (2) - VAC-J06R_ANG02A00\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nCumberland\n\nJ06\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n17.\n\nHorsepen Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nCumberland\n\nJ06\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n18.\n\nLittle Sandy Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nPrince Edward\n\nJ03\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n19.\n\nSaylers Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nPrince Edward\n\nJ06\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n20.\n\nSpring Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nPrince Edward\n\nJ02\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n21.\n\nWest Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nAmelia\n\nJ11\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n22.\n\nBriery Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nPrince Edward\n\nJ05\n\nE. coli\n\n3.50E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n23.\n\nBush River (1) - VAC-J04R_BSR02A02\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nPrince Edward\n\nJ04, J05\n\nE. coli\n\n3.50E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n24.\n\nBush River (2) - VAC-J03R_BSR03A02\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nPrince Edward\n\nJ03, J04, J05\n\nE. coli\n\n3.50E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n25.\n\nSwift Creek (1) - VAP-J16R_SFT01A00\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nChesterfield\n\nJ16\n\nE. coli\n\n8.37E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n26.\n\nSwift Creek (2) - VAP-J17R_SFT01B98\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nChesterfield\n\nJ16, J17\n\nE. coli\n\n3.24E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n27.\n\nSwift Creek (3) - VAP-J17R_SFT01C98\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nChesterfield\n\nJ16, J17\n\nE. coli\n\n4.76E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n28.\n\nFlat Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nNottoway, Amelia\n\nJ08, J09\n\nE. coli\n\n5.24E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n29.\n\nNibbs Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nAmelia\n\nJ09\n\nE. coli\n\n5.24E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n30.\n\nDeep Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nNottoway\n\nJ11\n\nE. coli\n\n8.71E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n31.\n\nAppomattox River (1) - VAC-J01R_APP03A02, VAC-J01R_APP04A02, VAC-J01R_APP05A04, VAC-J06R_APP05A02, VAP-J07R_APP01A98, VAP-J10R_APP01A98\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nCumberland, Powhatan, Amelia, Prince Edward, Appomattox\n\nJ01, J02, J03, J04, J05, J06, J07\n\nE. coli\n\n1.07E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n32.\n\nAppomattox River (2), lower - VAP-J15R_APP01A98\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nChesterfield, Cumberland, Powhatan, Nottoway, Amelia, Dinwiddie, Prince Edward, Appomattox\n\nJ01, J02, J03, J04, J05, J06, J07, J08, J09, J10, J11, J12, J13, J14, J15\n\nE. coli\n\n1.66E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n33.\n\nAppomattox River and tributaries, lower tidal (3) - VAP-J15E_APP01A98, VAP-J15E_APP02A98, VAP-J15E_APP02B12\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin\n\nChesterfield, Cumberland, Nottoway, Petersburg, Amelia, Colonial Heights, Prince Edward, Appomattox\n\nJ01, J02, J03, J04, J05, J06, J07, J08, J09, J10, J11, J12, J13, J14, J15, J16, J17\n\nE. coli\n\n7.47E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n34.\n\nBear Garden Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Bear Garden Creek Watershed\n\nBuckingham\n\nH20\n\nE. coli\n\n3.15E+08\n\ncfu/day\n\n35.\n\nStonewall Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek\n\nAppomattox\n\nH05\n\nE. coli\n\n9.28E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n36.\n\nBent Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek\n\nAppomattox\n\nH07\n\nE. coli\n\n2.26E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n37.\n\nNorth Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek\n\nAppomattox\n\nH06\n\nE. coli\n\n2.96E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n38.\n\nWreck Island Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek\n\nAppomattox\n\nH06\n\nE. coli\n\n8.76E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n39.\n\nWalkers Ford Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek\n\nAmherst\n\nH05\n\nE. coli\n\n8.90E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n40.\n\nBleakhorn Creek\n\nTMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Bleakhorn Creek, Bennett Creek, and Knotts Creek Bacterial Impairments\n\nSuffolk\n\nG13\n\nFecal coliform\n\n2.66E+09\n\nMPN/day\n\n41.\n\nKnotts Creek\n\nTMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Bleakhorn Creek, Bennett Creek, and Knotts Creek Bacterial Impairments\n\nSuffolk\n\nG13\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.07E+10\n\nMPN/day\n\n42.\n\nBennett Creek\n\nTMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Bleakhorn Creek, Bennett Creek, and Knotts Creek Bacterial Impairments\n\nSuffolk\n\nG13\n\nFecal coliform\n\n6.37E+10\n\nMPN/day\n\n43.\n\nChickahominy River and tributaries\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for Chickahominy River and Tributaries\n\nNew Kent, Henrico, Charles City, Hanover\n\nG05, G06, G07\n\nE. coli\n\n2.41E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n44.\n\nChuckatuck Creek and Brewers Creek\n\nShellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Chuckatuck Creek and Brewers Creek Watershed\n\nIsle of Wight\n\nG11\n\nFecal coliform\n\n4.79E+11\n\nMPN/day\n\n45.\n\nParadise Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed\n\nPortsmouth\n\nG15\n\nEnterococci\n\n5.04E+11\n\ncfu/day\n\n46.\n\nLafayette River, upper\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed\n\nNorfolk\n\nG15\n\nEnterococci\n\n1.05E+13\n\ncfu/day\n\n47.\n\nLower and Upper Western Branch, Elizabeth River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed\n\nChesapeake, Portsmouth\n\nG15\n\nEnterococci\n\n2.00E+13\n\ncfu/day\n\n48.\n\nUpper Mainstem, Lower Southern Branch, Lower Eastern Branch Elizabeth River, Broad Creek, Indian River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed\n\nChesapeake, Portsmouth, Norfolk\n\nG15, K39\n\nEnterococci\n\n5.78E+13\n\ncfu/day\n\n49.\n\nFourmile Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL for Fourmile Creek\n\nHenrico\n\nG02\n\nE. coli\n\n3.99E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n50.\n\nHardware River, North Fork\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for North Fork Hardware River and Hardware River\n\nAlbemarle\n\nH18\n\nE. coli\n\n0.06E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n51.\n\nHardware River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for North Fork Hardware River and Hardware River\n\nFluvanna, Albemarle\n\nH18, H19\n\nE. coli\n\n0.02E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n52.\n\nWalker Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hays Creek, Moffatts Creek, Walker Creek, and Otts Creek\n\nRockbridge\n\nI34\n\nE. coli\n\n6.00E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n53.\n\nOtts Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hays Creek, Moffatts Creek, Walker Creek, and Otts Creek\n\nAugusta\n\nI34\n\nE. coli\n\n9.00E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n54.\n\nHays Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hays Creek, Moffatts Creek, Walker Creek, and Otts Creek\n\nRockbridge\n\nI34\n\nE. coli\n\n2.00E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n55.\n\nHoffler Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Hoffler Creek Watershed\n\nPortsmouth\n\nG15\n\nEnterococci\n\n5.39E+11\n\ncfu/day\n\n56.\n\nPowell Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover\n\nPrince George\n\nG03\n\nE. coli\n\n6.12E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n57.\n\nBailey Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover\n\nPrince George\n\nG03\n\nE. coli\n\n1.62E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n58.\n\nBailey Bay, Bailey Creek, Cattail Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover\n\nPrince George, Hopewell\n\nG03\n\nE. coli\n\n8.47E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n59.\n\nJames River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover\n\nPrince George, Charles City, Hopewell\n\nG03\n\nE. coli\n\n8.67E+14\n\ncfu/year\n\n60.\n\nAustin Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin\n\nBuckingham\n\nH21\n\nE. coli\n\n1.62E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n61.\n\nFisby Branch\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin\n\nBuckingham\n\nH21\n\nE. coli\n\n2.15E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n62.\n\nRock Island Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin\n\nBuckingham\n\nH17\n\nE. coli\n\n3.38E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n63.\n\nSlate River, upper\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin\n\nBuckingham\n\nH21\n\nE. coli\n\n4.22E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n64.\n\nTroublesome Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin\n\nBuckingham\n\nH21\n\nE. coli\n\n5.23E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n65.\n\nNorth River\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin\n\nBuckingham\n\nH21\n\nE. coli\n\n5.52E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n66.\n\nBallinger Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin\n\nAlbemarle\n\nH17\n\nE. coli\n\n5.75E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n67.\n\nTotier Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin\n\nAlbemarle\n\nH17\n\nE. coli\n\n1.62E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n68.\n\nSlate River, lower\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin\n\nBuckingham\n\nH21, H22\n\nE. coli\n\n3.19E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n69.\n\nFine Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region\n\nPowhatan\n\nH38\n\nE. coli\n\n3.66E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n70.\n\nBig Lickinghole Creek, Little Lickinghole Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region\n\nGoochland\n\nH37\n\nE. coli\n\n7.94E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n71.\n\nByrd Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region\n\nGoochland, Fluvanna\n\nH34\n\nE. coli\n\n1.08E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n72.\n\nUpper James River\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region\n\nCumberland, Fluvanna, Powhatan, Goochland\n\nH33, H34, H37\n\nE. coli\n\n3.50E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n73.\n\nBeaverdam Creek\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region\n\nGoochland\n\nH38\n\nE. coli\n\n1.60E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n74.\n\nJames River, lower\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region\n\nCumberland, Fluvanna, Powhatan, Goochland\n\nH33, H34, H37, H38\n\nE. coli\n\n8.20E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n75.\n\nNo Name Creek\n\nBacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond\n\nChesterfield\n\nG01\n\nE. coli\n\n4.66E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n76.\n\nBernards Creek\n\nBacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond\n\nPowhatan\n\nH39\n\nE. coli\n\n1.67E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n77.\n\nGoode Creek\n\nBacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond\n\nRichmond City\n\nG01\n\nE. coli\n\n2.52E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n78.\n\nGillies Creek\n\nBacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond\n\nHenrico, Richmond City\n\nG01\n\nE. coli\n\n2.93E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n79.\n\nPowhite Creek\n\nBacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond\n\nChesterfield\n\nH39\n\nE. coli\n\n3.34E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n80.\n\nAlmond Creek\n\nBacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond\n\nHenrico\n\nG01\n\nE. coli\n\n4.39E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n81.\n\nFalling Creek\n\nBacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond\n\nChesterfield, Richmond City\n\nG01\n\nE. coli\n\n1.64E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n82.\n\nReedy Creek\n\nBacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond\n\nRichmond City\n\nH39\n\nE. coli\n\n8.23E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n83.\n\nJames River, tidal\n\nBacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond\n\nHenrico, Richmond City, Goochland, Powhatan, Chesterfield\n\nG01, G02, H39\n\nE. coli\n\n3.76E+14\n\ncfu/year\n\n84.\n\nJames River, lower\n\nBacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond\n\nHenrico, Richmond City, Goochland, Powhatan, Chesterfield\n\nH39\n\nE. coli\n\n3.06E+15\n\ncfu/year\n\n85.\n\nIvy Creek\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nLynchburg, Bedford\n\nH03\n\nE. coli\n\n4.07E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n86.\n\nBurton Creek\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nLynchburg, Campbell\n\nH03\n\nE. coli\n\n3.47E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n87.\n\nJudith Creek\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nLynchburg, Bedford\n\nH03\n\nE. coli\n\n3.26E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n88.\n\nTomahawk Creek\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nBedford, Campbell, Lynchburg\n\nH03\n\nE. coli\n\n1.01E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n89.\n\nFishing Creek\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nLynchburg\n\nH03\n\nE. coli\n\n3.76E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n90.\n\nBlackwater Creek\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nLynchburg\n\nH03\n\nE. coli\n\n3.61E+14\n\ncfu/year\n\n91.\n\nJames River, lower\n\nE.coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nAmherst, Bedford, Campbell, Lynchburg\n\nH03, H05\n\nE. coli\n\n1.33E+15\n\ncfu/year\n\n92.\n\nBaptist Run\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River\n\nYork\n\nG11\n\nE. coli\n\n3.89E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n93.\n\nDeep Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River\n\nNewport News\n\nG11, C07\n\nEnterococci\n\n5.59E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n94.\n\nSkiffes Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River\n\nJames City\n\nG11\n\nFecal coliform\n\n2.46E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n95.\n\nJames River, Warwick River\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River\n\nNewport News, York\n\nG11\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.04E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n96.\n\nKings Creek and Bay\n\nShellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Kings Creek and Bay and Ballard Creek and Bay Watersheds\n\nIsle of Wight\n\nG11\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.23E+09\n\ncounts/day\n\n97.\n\nBallard Creek and Bay\n\nShellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Kings Creek and Bay and Ballard Creek and Bay Watersheds\n\nIsle of Wight\n\nG11\n\nFecal coliform\n\n1.64E+09\n\ncounts/day\n\n98.\n\nLawnes Creek\n\nTMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Lawnes Creek Bacterial Impairment\n\nSurry\n\nG11\n\nFecal coliform\n\n5.94E+08\n\nMPN/day\n\n99.\n\nLooney Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL for Looney Creek\n\nBotetourt\n\nI26\n\nE. coli\n\n1.84E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n100.\n\nBuffalo Creek, South Fork\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek\n\nBotetourt, Rockbridge\n\nI38\n\nE. coli\n\n2.01E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n101.\n\nColliers Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek\n\nRockbridge\n\nI38\n\nE. coli\n\n4.75E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n102.\n\nCedar Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek\n\nRockbridge\n\nI28\n\nE. coli\n\n5.01E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n103.\n\nBuffalo Creek, North Fork\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek\n\nRockbridge\n\nI38\n\nE. coli\n\n6.52E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n104.\n\nBuffalo Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek\n\nRockbridge\n\nI38\n\nE. coli\n\n1.91E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n105.\n\nMaury River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek\n\nBuena Vista, Rockbridge\n\nI37, I38\n\nE. coli\n\n2.98E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n106.\n\nPowhatan Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek and Powhatan Creek\n\nJames City\n\nG10\n\nE. coli\n\n1.78E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n107.\n\nMill Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek and Powhatan Creek\n\nJames City\n\nG10\n\nEnterococci\n\n3.63E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n108.\n\nPowhatan Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek and Powhatan Creek\n\nJames City\n\nG10\n\nEnterococci\n\n7.24E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n109.\n\nMoores Creek\n\nDevelopment of the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Moore's Creek, Albemarle County, Virginia\n\nCharlottesville, Albemarle\n\nH28\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.30E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n110.\n\nMorris Creek\n\nMorris Creek (tidal), Charles City County Total Maximum Daily Load for Bacteria Contamination Impaired for Recreational Use\n\nCharles City\n\nG08\n\nEnterococci\n\n2.92E+10\n\ncfu/day\n\n111.\n\nShingle Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River\n\nSuffolk\n\nG13, K39\n\nFecal coliform\n\n2.78E+09\n\ncfu/year\n\n112.\n\nNansemond River, upper and middle\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River\n\nIsle of Wight, Suffolk\n\nG12, G13, G14\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.89E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n113.\n\nShingle Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River\n\nSuffolk\n\nG13, K39\n\nEnterococci\n\n2.19E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n114.\n\nNansemond River, upper\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River\n\nIsle of Wight, Suffolk\n\nG12, G13, G14\n\nEnterococci\n\n9.99E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n115.\n\nNansemond River (Lake Meade)\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River\n\nSuffolk\n\nG12, G13\n\nEnterococci\n\n9.99E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n116.\n\nPagan River, middle and upper\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Pagan River\n\nIsle of Wight\n\nG11\n\nEnterococci\n\n3.01E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n117.\n\nPagan River and Jones Creek\n\nFecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Pagan River\n\nIsle of Wight\n\nG11\n\nFecal coliform\n\n2.15E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n118.\n\nReed Creek, lower\n\nBacteria TMDL for Reed Creek\n\nBedford\n\nH01\n\nE. coli\n\n0\n\ncfu/year\n\n119.\n\nBeaver Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds\n\nAlbemarle\n\nH23\n\nE. coli\n\n3.29E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n120.\n\nMechums River\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds\n\nAlbemarle\n\nH23\n\nE. coli\n\n3.31E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n121.\n\nPreddy Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds\n\nGreene, Albemarle\n\nH27\n\nE. coli\n\n2.43E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n122.\n\nRivanna River, North Fork\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds\n\nGreene, Albemarle\n\nH27\n\nE. coli\n\n2.15E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n123.\n\nMeadow Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds\n\nCharlottesville\n\nH28\n\nE. coli\n\n3.89E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n124.\n\nRivanna River\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds\n\nCharlottesville, Albemarle, Greene\n\nH23, H24, H25, H26, H27, H28\n\nE. coli\n\n4.93E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n125.\n\nRockfish River, North Fork\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Rockfish River, North Fork Rockfish River, and South Fork Rockfish River\n\nNelson\n\nH15\n\nE. coli\n\n8.44E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n126.\n\nRockfish River, South Fork\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Rockfish River, North Fork Rockfish River, and South Fork Rockfish River\n\nNelson\n\nH15\n\nE. coli\n\n4.40E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n127.\n\nRockfish River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Rockfish River, North Fork Rockfish River, and South Fork Rockfish River\n\nNelson\n\nH15, H16\n\nE. coli\n\n5.76E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n128.\n\nTuckahoe Creek and tributaries\n\nBacteria TMDL for Tuckahoe Creek, Little Tuckahoe Creek, Anderson, Broad, Georges and Readers Branches, and Deep Run\n\nHenrico, Goochland\n\nH39\n\nE. coli\n\n1.05E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n129.\n\nTurner Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River\n\nAmherst\n\nH12\n\nE. coli\n\n1.57E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n130.\n\nMill Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River\n\nAmherst\n\nH11\n\nE. coli\n\n2.08E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n131.\n\nHat Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River\n\nNelson\n\nH09\n\nE. coli\n\n6.02E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n132.\n\nRutledge Creek\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River\n\nAmherst\n\nH12\n\nE. coli\n\n1.15E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n133.\n\nRucker Run\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River\n\nNelson\n\nH13\n\nE. coli\n\n1.32E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n134.\n\nPiney River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River\n\nAmherst, Nelson\n\nH10\n\nE. coli\n\n2.44E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n135.\n\nBuffalo River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River\n\nAmherst\n\nH11, H12\n\nE. coli\n\n2.54E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n136.\n\nTye River\n\nBacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River\n\nAmherst, Nelson\n\nH09, H10, H11, H12, H13\n\nE. coli\n\n1.33E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n137.\n\nUpham Brook and tributaries\n\nTotal Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upham Brook Watershed\n\nHenrico, Richmond City\n\nG05\n\nE. coli\n\n8.04E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n138.\n\nWhite Oak Swamp\n\nBacteria TMDL for White Oak Swamp\n\nHenrico\n\nG06\n\nE. coli\n\n1.58E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n139.\n\nWillis River and tributaries\n\nFecal coliform TMDL Development for Willis River\n\nCumberland, Buckingham\n\nH35, H36\n\nFecal coliform\n\n3.15E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n140.\n\nNorth Creek\n\nBenthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the North Creek Watershed\n\nFluvanna\n\nH20R\n\nSediment\n\n7.29\n\ntons/yr\n\n141.\n\nNorth Creek\n\nBenthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the North Creek Watershed\n\nFluvanna\n\nH20R\n\nTotal phosphorus\n\n187.3\n\nlbs/yr\n\n142.\n\nTurkey Island Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for the Turkey Island Creek and James River Westover to Claremont Watershed\n\nHenrico, Charles City\n\nG02R\n\nE. coli\n\n4.31E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n143.\n\nJames River from Westover to Chippokes Point\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for the Turkey Island Creek and James River Westover to Claremont Watershed\n\nCharles City, Prince George\n\nG02R, G04R\n\nE. coli\n\n4.25E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n144.\n\nJames River from Chippokes Point to Claremont\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for the Turkey Island Creek and James River Westover to Claremont Watershed\n\nPrince George, Surry\n\nG04E, G04R\n\nE. coli\n\n4.99E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n145.\n\nMoores Creek\n\nSediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch\n\nAlbemarle,\n\nCity of Charlottesville\n\nH28\n\nSediment\n\n809.48\n\ntons/yr\n\n146.\n\nLodge Creek\n\nSediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch\n\nAlbemarle,\n\nCity of Charlottesville\n\nH28\n\nSediment\n\n46.25\n\ntons/yr\n\n147.\n\nMeadow Creek\n\nSediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch\n\nAlbemarle,\n\nCity of Charlottesville\n\nH28\n\nSediment\n\n452.33\n\ntons/yr\n\n148.\n\nSchenks Branch\n\nSediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch\n\nCity of Charlottesville\n\nH28\n\nSediment\n\n134.52\n\ntons/yr\n\n149.\n\nJames River, upper\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nAmherst, Bedford\n\nH01R, I28R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.27E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n150.\n\nBeaver Creek\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nCampbell\n\nH05R\n\nE. coli\n\n3.26E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n151.\n\nPedlar River\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nAmherst\n\nH02R\n\nE. coli\n\n7.86E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n152.\n\nHarris Creek\n\nE. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA\n\nAmherst\n\nH04R\n\nE. coli\n\n1.02E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n153.\n\nDiascund Creek, nontidal\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA\n\nNew Kent\n\nG09R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.51E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n154.\n\nBeaverdam Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA\n\nNew Kent\n\nG09R\n\nE. coli\n\n1.27E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n155.\n\nUnnamed tributary to Beaverdam Creek (SAH)\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA\n\nNew Kent\n\nG09R\n\nE. coli\n\n4.52E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n156.\n\nBarrows Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA\n\nCharles City\n\nG08R\n\nE. coli\n\n6.90E+10\n\ncfu/year\n\n157.\n\nMill Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA\n\nJames City\n\nG08R\n\nE. coli\n\n9.90E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n158.\n\nDiascund Creek, tidal\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA\n\nNew Kent, James City\n\nG08E\n\nEnterococci\n\n7.12E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n159.\n\nChickahominy River\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA\n\nNew Kent, James City, Charles City\n\nG08E\n\nEnterococci\n\n9.57E+13\n\ncfu/year\n\n160.\n\nGordon Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA\n\nJames City\n\nG08E\n\nEnterococci\n\n6.15E+12\n\ncfu/year\n\n161.\n\nWoods Creek\n\nBacteria TMDL Development and a Proactive Approach to Address the Benthic Impairment for Woods Creek, Rockbridge County and City of Lexington, Virginia\n\nRockbridge, City of Lexington\n\nI35R\n\nE.coli\n\n3.97E+11\n\ncfu/year\n\n162.\n\nSinking Creek\n\nBacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia\n\nBotetourt\n\nI18R\n\nE. coli\n\n1.17E+9\n\ncounts/year\n\n163.\n\nBarbours Creek\n\nBacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia\n\nCraig\n\nI22R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.36E+9\n\ncounts/year\n\n164.\n\nLapsley Run\n\nBacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia\n\nBotetourt\n\nI24R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.45E+8\n\ncounts/year\n\n165.\n\nLittle Patterson Creek\n\nBacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia\n\nBotetourt\n\nI22R\n\nE. coli\n\n5.38E+8\n\ncounts/year\n\n166.\n\nUpper Craig Creek\n\nBacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia\n\nCraig\n\nI19R\n\nE. coli\n\n3.93E+9\n\ncounts/year\n\n167.\n\nMiddle Craig Creek\n\nBacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia\n\nCraig\n\nI22R\n\nE. coli\n\n1.54E+10\n\ncounts/year\n\n168.\n\nLower Craig Creek\n\nBacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia\n\nBotetourt\n\nI22R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.07E+10\n\ncounts/year\n\n169.\n\nCatawba Creek\n\nBacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia\n\nBotetourt\n\nI25R\n\nE. coli\n\n3.00E+9\n\ncounts/year\n\n170.\n\nJames River\n\nBacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia\n\nBotetourt\n\nI18R\n\nE. coli\n\n4.19E+10\n\ncounts/year\n\n171.\n\nCatawba Creek\n\nBacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia\n\nBotetourt\n\nI25R\n\nSediment\n\n29.44\n\ntons/year\n\n172.\n\nBullpasture River\n\nBacteria TMDL Development for the Bullpasture River in Highland County, Virginia\n\nHighland\n\nI13R\n\nE. coli\n\n2.63E+12\n\ncounts/year\n\n173.\n\nBlue Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Orange\n\nH27R\n\nSediment\n\n20,750\n\nlbs/year\n\n174.\n\nMarsh Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Orange\n\nH27R\n\nSediment\n\n5,210\n\nlbs/year\n\n175.\n\nPreddy Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Orange\n\nH27R\n\nSediment\n\n105,600\n\nlbs/year\n\n176.\n\nPreddy Creek\n\nNorth Branch\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Orange\n\nH27R\n\nSediment\n\n47,940\n\nlbs/year\n\n177.\n\nQuarter Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Orange\n\nH27R\n\nSediment\n\n11,020\n\nlbs/year\n\n178.\n\nStandardsville Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Orange\n\nH27R\n\nSediment\n\n6,105\n\nlbs/year\n\n179.\n\nSwift Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Orange\n\nH27R\n\nSediment\n\n89,130\n\nlbs/year\n\n180.\n\nUnnamed tributary to Flat Branch\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Orange\n\nH27R\n\nSediment\n\n27,890\n\nlbs/year\n\n181.\n\nBlue Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Orange\n\nH27R\n\nTotal Phosphorus\n\n21.8\n\nlbs/year\n\n182.\n\nStandardsville Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties\n\nAlbemarle, Greene, Orange\n\nH27R\n\nTotal Phosphorus\n\n4.6\n\nlbs/year\n\n183.\n\nMoores Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the Moores Creek and Mill Creek Watersheds Located in Rockbridge County, Virginia\n\nRockbridge, Augusta\n\nI36R\n\nSediment\n\n60,080\n\nlbs/year\n\n184.\n\nMill Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for the Moores Creek and Mill Creek Watersheds Located in Rockbridge County, Virginia\n\nRockbridge\n\nI35R\n\nSediment\n\n44,360\n\nlbs/year\n\n185.\n\nBailey Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Bailey Creek, Nuttree Branch, Oldtown Creek, Proctors Creek, Rohoic Creek, and Swift Creek Watersheds Located in Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, and Prince George Counties and Cities of Hopewell, Colonial Heights, and Petersburg\n\nPrince George, Hopewell\n\nG03R\n\nSediment\n\n424,000\n\nlbs/yr\n\n186.\n\nNuttree Branch\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Bailey Creek, Nuttree Branch, Oldtown Creek, Proctors Creek, Rohoic Creek, and Swift Creek Watersheds Located in Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, and Prince George Counties and Cities of Hopewell, Colonial Heights, and Petersburg\n\nChesterfield\n\nJ17R\n\nSediment\n\n303,000\n\nlbs/yr\n\n187.\n\nOldtown Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Bailey Creek, Nuttree Branch, Oldtown Creek, Proctors Creek, Rohoic Creek, and Swift Creek Watersheds Located in Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, and Prince George Counties and Cities of Hopewell, Colonial Heights, and Petersburg\n\nChesterfield, Colonial Heights\n\nJ15R\n\nSediment\n\n253,000\n\nlbs/yr\n\n188.\n\nOldtown Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Bailey Creek, Nuttree Branch, Oldtown Creek, Proctors Creek, Rohoic Creek, and Swift Creek Watersheds Located in Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, and Prince George Counties and Cities of Hopewell, Colonial Heights, and Petersburg\n\nChesterfield, Colonial Heights\n\nJ15R\n\nPhosphorous\n\n404\n\nlbs/yr\n\n189.\n\nProctors Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Bailey Creek, Nuttree Branch, Oldtown Creek, Proctors Creek, Rohoic Creek, and Swift Creek Watersheds Located in Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, and Prince George Counties and Cities of Hopewell, Colonial Heights, and Petersburg\n\nChesterfield\n\nG01R\n\nSediment\n\n573,000\n\nlbs/yr\n\n190.\n\nRohoic Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Bailey Creek, Nuttree Branch, Oldtown Creek, Proctors Creek, Rohoic Creek, and Swift Creek Watersheds Located in Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, and Prince George Counties and Cities of Hopewell, Colonial Heights, and Petersburg\n\nDinwiddie, Petersburg\n\nJ15R\n\nSediment\n\n377,000\n\nlbs/yr\n\n191.\n\nRohoic Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Bailey Creek, Nuttree Branch, Oldtown Creek, Proctors Creek, Rohoic Creek, and Swift Creek Watersheds Located in Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, and Prince George Counties and Cities of Hopewell, Colonial Heights, and Petersburg\n\nDinwiddie, Petersburg\n\nJ15R\n\nPhosphorous\n\n426\n\nlbs/yr\n\n192.\n\nSwift Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Bailey Creek, Nuttree Branch, Oldtown Creek, Proctors Creek, Rohoic Creek, and Swift Creek Watersheds Located in Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, and Prince George Counties and Cities of Hopewell, Colonial Heights, and Petersburg\n\nChesterfield, Powhatan\n\nJ17R\n\nSediment\n\n2,870,000\n\nlbs/yr\n\n193.\n\nSwift Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Bailey Creek, Nuttree Branch, Oldtown Creek, Proctors Creek, Rohoic Creek, and Swift Creek Watersheds Located in Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, and Prince George Counties and Cities of Hopewell, Colonial Heights, and Petersburg\n\nChesterfield, Powhatan\n\nJ17R\n\nPhosphorous\n\n3,145\n\nlbs/yr\n\n194.\n\nNon-tidal James River above Bent Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Middle and Upper James River, Maury River, and Jackson River Watersheds\n\nBotetourt, Rockbridge\n\nI18, I24, I27, I28, I37, H01, H03, H05\n\nPCB\n\n190,000\n\nmg/year\n\n195.\n\nNon-tidal James River below Bent Creek\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Middle and Upper James River, Maury River, and Jackson River Watersheds\n\nAmherst, Bedford, Campbell, Appomattox, Nelson, Buckingham, Albemarle, Fluvanna, Cumberland, Goochland, Powhatan, Henrico, Chesterfield Counties and Cities of Lynchburg and Richmond\n\nH08, H14, H17, H19, H20, H22, H33, H38, H39\n\nPCB\n\n160,000\n\nmg/year\n\n196.\n\nMaury River\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Middle and Upper James River, Maury River, and Jackson River Watersheds\n\nRockbridge, Buena Vista\n\nI37\n\nPCB\n\n4,100\n\nmg/year\n\n197.\n\nJackson River\n\nPCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Middle and Upper James River, Maury River, and Jackson River Watersheds\n\nAlleghany, Covington\n\nI04, I09\n\nPCB\n\n170,000\n\nmg/year\n\n198.\n\nBlack Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Black Creek and Hat Creek Watersheds Located in Nelson County, Virginia\n\nNelson\n\nH09R\n\nSediment\n\n30,730\n\nlbs/year\n\n199.\n\nHat Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Black Creek and Hat Creek Watersheds Located in Nelson County, Virginia\n\nNelson\n\nH09R\n\nSediment\n\n45,461\n\nlbs/year\n\n200.\n\nBlack Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Development for Black Creek and Hat Creek Watersheds Located in Nelson County, Virginia\n\nNelson\n\nH09R\n\nPhosphorus\n\n712\n\nlbs/year\n\n201.\n\nDeep Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Study on Deep Run, Dover Creek, and Upham Brook Watersheds in Henrico County, Goochland County, and the City of Richmond\n\nHenrico, Richmond City\n\nH39R\n\nSediment\n\n319,359\n\nlbs/year\n\n202.\n\nStony Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Study on Deep Run, Dover Creek, and Upham Brook Watersheds in Henrico County, Goochland County, and the City of Richmond\n\nHenrico\n\nH39R\n\nSediment\n\n140,916\n\nlbs/year\n\n203.\n\nStony Run UT\n\nBenthic TMDL Study on Deep Run, Dover Creek, and Upham Brook Watersheds in Henrico County, Goochland County, and the City of Richmond\n\nHenrico\n\nH39R\n\nSediment\n\n32,745\n\nlbs/year\n\n204.\n\nDover Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Study on Deep Run, Dover Creek, and Upham Brook Watersheds in Henrico County, Goochland County, and the City of Richmond\n\nGoochland\n\nH39R\n\nSediment\n\n38,769\n\nlbs/year\n\n205.\n\nUpham Brook\n\nBenthic TMDL Study on Deep Run, Dover Creek, and Upham Brook Watersheds in Henrico County, Goochland County, and the City of Richmond\n\nHenrico, Richmond City\n\nG05R\n\nSediment\n\n372,238\n\nlbs/year\n\n206.\n\nNorth Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Study on Deep Run, Dover Creek, and Upham Brook Watersheds in Henrico County, Goochland County, and the City of Richmond\n\nHenrico\n\nG05R\n\nSediment\n\n363,179\n\nlbs/year\n\n207.\n\nJordans Branch\n\nBenthic TMDL Study on Deep Run, Dover Creek, and Upham Brook Watersheds in Henrico County, Goochland County, and the City of Richmond\n\nRichmond City\n\nG05R\n\nSediment\n\n88,183\n\nlbs/year\n\n208.\n\nStony Run\n\nBenthic TMDL Study on Deep Run, Dover Creek, and Upham Brook Watersheds in Henrico County, Goochland County, and the City of Richmond\n\nHenrico\n\nH39R\n\nPhosphorus\n\n121.6\n\nlbs/year\n\n209.\n\nDover Creek\n\nBenthic TMDL Study on Deep Run, Dover Creek, and Upham Brook Watersheds in Henrico County, Goochland County, and the City of Richmond\n\nGoochland\n\nH39R\n\nPhosphorus\n\n41.6\n\nlbs/year\n\n210.\n\nUpham Brook\n\nBenthic TMDL Study on Deep Run, Dover Creek, and Upham Brook Watersheds in Henrico County, Goochland County, and the City of Richmond\n\nHenrico\n\nG05R\n\nPhosphorus\n\n2,693.8\n\nlbs/year\n\nNotes:\n\n1 The total WLA can be increased prior to modification provided that the Department of Environmental Quality tracks these changes for bacteria TMDLs where the permit is consistent with water quality standards for bacteria.\n\n2 GS means growing season.\n\nB. Stream segment classifications, effluent limitations including water quality based effluent limitations, and wasteload allocations.\n\nTABLE B1 - UPPER JAMES RIVER BASIN RECOMMENDED SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION\n\nStream Name\n\nSegment No.\n\nMile to Mile\n\nClassification\n\nComments\n\nMaury River\n\n2-4\n\n80.3-0.0\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries\n\nJames River\n\n2-5\n\n271.5-266.0\n\nW.Q.\n\nMain only\n\nJames River\n\n2-6\n\n266.0-115.0\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries except Tye \u0026 Rivanna River\n\nTye River\n\n2-7\n\n41.7-0.0\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries except Rutledge Creek\n\nRutledge Creek\n\n2-8\n\n3.0-0.0\n\nW.Q.\n\nMain only\n\nPiney River\n\n2-9\n\n20.6-0.0\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries\n\nRivanna River\n\n2-10\n\n20.0-0.0\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries\n\nRivanna River\n\n2-11\n\n38.1-20.0\n\nW.Q.\n\nMain only\n\nRivanna River\n\n2-12\n\n76.7-38.1\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries\n\nS.F. Rivanna River\n\n2-13\n\n12.2-0.0\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries\n\nMechums River\n\n2-14\n\n23.1-0.0\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries\n\nN.F. Rivanna River\n\n2-15\n\n17.0-0.0\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries except Standardsville Run\n\nStandardsville Run\n\n2-16\n\n1.2-0.0\n\nW.Q.\n\nMain only\n\nAppomattox River\n\n2-17\n\n156.2-27.7\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries except Buffalo Creek, Courthouse Branch, and Deep Creek\n\nBuffalo Creek\n\n2-18\n\n20.9-0.0\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries except unnamed tributary @ R.M. 9.3\n\nUnnamed tributary of Buffalo Creek @ R.M. 9.3\n\n2-19\n\n1.3-0.0\n\nW.Q.\n\nMain only\n\nCourthouse Branch\n\n2-20\n\n0.6-0.0\n\nW.Q.\n\nMain only\n\nDeep Creek\n\n2-21\n\n29.5-0.0\n\nE.L.\n\nMain \u0026 tributaries except unnamed tributary @ R.M. 25.0\n\nUnnamed tributary of Deep Creek @ R.M. 25.0\n\n2-22\n\n2.2-0.0\n\nW.Q.\n\nMain only\n\nTABLE B2 - UPPER JAMES RIVER BASIN LOAD ALLOCATIONS BASED ON EXISTING DISCHARGE POINT7\n\nStream Name\n\nSegment Number\n\nClassification\n\nMile to Mile\n\nSignificant Discharges\n\nTotal Assimilative Capacity of Stream BOD5 lbs/day\n\nWasteload Allocation BOD5 lbs/day2\n\nReserve BOD5 lbs/day5\n\nCedar Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n1.9-0.0\n\nNatural Bridge, Inc. STP\n\n35.0\n\n28.0\n\n7.0 (20%)\n\nElk Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n2.8-0.0\n\nNatural Bridge Camp for Boys STP\n\n7.0\n\n3.3\n\n3.7 (53%)\n\nLittle Calfpasture River\n\n2-4\n\nE.L.\n\n10.9-4.0\n\nCraigsville\n\n12.0\n\n9.6\n\n2.4 (20%)\n\nCabin River\n\n2-4\n\nE.L.\n\n1.7-0.0\n\nMillboro\n\nSelf -sustaining\n\nNone\n\nNone\n\nMaury River\n\n2-4\n\nE.L.\n\n19.6-12.2\n\nLexington STP\n\n380.0\n\n380.0\n\nNone\n\nMaury River\n\n2-4\n\nE.L.\n\n12.2-1.2\n\nGeorgia Bonded Fibers\n\n760.0\n\n102.03\n\n238.0 (31%)\n\nBuena Vista STP\n\n420.0\n\nMaury River\n\n2-4\n\nE.L.\n\n1.2-0.0\n\nLees Carpets\n\n790.0\n\n425.03\n\n290.0 (37%)\n\nGlasgow STP\n\n75.0\n\nJames River\n\n2-5\n\nW.Q.\n\n271.5-266.0\n\nOwens-Illinois\n\n4,640.0\n\n4,640.03\n\nNone\n\nJames River\n\n2-6\n\nE.L.\n\n257.5-231.0\n\nLynchburg STP\n\n10,100.0\n\n8,000.0\n\n2,060.0 (20%)\n\nBabcock \u0026 Wilcox-NNFD\n\n40.03\n\nJames River\n\n2-6\n\nE.L.\n\n231.0-202.0\n\nVirginia Fibre\n\n3,500.0\n\n3,500.0\n\nNone\n\nRutledge Creek\n\n2-8\n\nW.Q.\n\n3.0-0.0\n\nAmherst STP\n\n46.0\n\n37.0\n\n9.0 (20%)\n\nTown Creek\n\n2-7\n\nE.L.\n\n2.1-0.0\n\nLovingston STP\n\n26.0\n\n21.0\n\n5.0 (20%)\n\nIvy Creek\n\n2-6\n\nE.L.\n\n0.1-0.0\n\nSchuyler\n\n13.8\n\n11.0\n\n2.8 (20%)\n\nJames River\n\n2-6\n\nE.L.\n\n186.0-179.0\n\nUniroyal, Inc.\n\n1,400.0\n\n19.36\n\n1,336.0 (95%)\n\nScottsville STP\n\n45.0\n\nNorth Creek\n\n2-6\n\nE.L.\n\n3.1-0.0\n\nFork Union STP\n\n31.0\n\n25.0\n\n6.0 (20%)\n\nHowells Branch and Lickinghole Creek\n\n2-14\n\nE.L.\n\n0.7-0.0\n\nMorton Frozen Foods\n\n20.0\n\n20.03\n\nNone\n\nStandardsville Run\n\n2-16\n\nW.Q.\n\n1.2-0.0\n\nStandardsville STP\n\n17.9\n\n14.3\n\n3.6 (20%)\n\nRivanna River\n\n2-11\n\nW.Q.\n\n23.5-20.0\n\nLake Monticello STP\n\n480.0\n\n380.0\n\n100.0 (20%)\n\nRivanna River\n\n2-10\n\nE.L.\n\n15.0-0.0\n\nPalmyra\n\n250.0\n\n4.0\n\n158.0 (63%)\n\nSchwarzenbach Huber\n\n88.03\n\nUnnamed tributary of Whispering Creek\n\n2-6\n\nE.L.\n\n1.2-0.0\n\nDillwyn STP\n\n38.0\n\n30.0\n\n8.0 (21%)\n\nSouth Fork Appomattox River\n\n2-17\n\nE.L.\n\n5.5-0.0\n\nAppomattox Lagoon\n\n18.8\n\n15.0\n\n3.8 (20%)\n\nUnnamed tributary of Buffalo Creek\n\n2-19\n\nW.Q.\n\n1.3-0.0\n\nHampden-Sydney Coll. STP\n\n10.0\n\n8.0\n\n2.0 (20%)\n\nAppomattox River\n\n2-17\n\nE.L.\n\n106.1-88.0\n\nFarmville STP\n\n280.0\n\n220.0\n\n60.0 (21%)\n\nUnnamed tributary of Little Guinea Creek\n\n2-17\n\nE.L.\n\n2.5-1.3\n\nCumberland H.S. Lagoon\n\n0.6\n\n0.5\n\n0.1 (20%)\n\nUnnamed tributary of Tear Wallet Creek\n\n2-17\n\nE.L.\n\n0.68-0.0\n\nCumberland Courthouse\n\n8.8\n\n7.0\n\n1.8 (20%)\n\nCourthouse Branch\n\n2-22\n\nW.Q.\n\n2.2-0.0\n\nAmelia STP\n\n21.0\n\n17.0\n\n4.0 (20%)\n\nUnnamed tributary of Deep Creek\n\n2-22\n\nW.Q.\n\n2.2-0.0\n\nCrewe STP\n\n50.311,12\n\n50.111, 12\n\n0.2 (0.4%)11,12,13\n\nNotes:\n\n1 Recommended classification.\n\n2 Based on 2020 loads or stream assimilative capacity less 20%.\n\n3 Load allocation based on published NPDES permits.\n\n4 This assimilative capacity is based upon an ammonia loading no greater than 125.1 lbs/day.\n\n5 Percentages refer to reserve as percent of total assimilative capacity. Minimum reserve for future growth and modeling accuracy is 20% unless otherwise noted.\n\n6 No NPDES Permits published (BPT not established) allocation base on maximum value monitored.\n\n7 This table is for the existing discharge point. The recommended plan may involve relocation or elimination of stream discharge.\n\n8 Assimilative capacity will be determined upon completion of the ongoing study by Hydroscience, Inc.\n\n9 Discharges into Karnes Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River.\n\n10 Discharges into Wilson Creek, near its confluence with Jackson River.\n\n11 Five-day Carbonaceous Biological Oxygen Demand (cBOD5).\n\n12 Revision supersedes all subsequent Crewe STP stream capacity, allocation, and reserve references.\n\n13 0.4% reserve: determined by SWCB Piedmont Regional Office.\n\nSource: Wiley \u0026 Wilson, Inc.\n\nTABLE B3 - UPPER JAMES RIVER BASIN ADDITIONAL LOAD ALLOCATIONS\n\nBASED ON RECOMMENDED DISCHARGE POINT\n\nStream Name\n\nSegment Number\n\nClassification1\n\nSignificant Discharges\n\nTotal Assimilative Capacity of Stream BOD5 lbs/day\n\nWasteload2 Allocation BOD5 lbs/day\n\nReserve4 BOD5 lbs/day5\n\nMill Creek\n\n2-4\n\nE.L.\n\n5.5-0.0\n\nMillboro\n\n30.0\n\n7.3\n\n22.7 (76%)\n\nCalfpasture River\n\n2-4\n\nE.L.\n\n4.9-0.0\n\nGoshen\n\n65.0\n\n12.0\n\n53.0 (82%)\n\nMaury River\n\n2-4\n\nE.L.\n\n1.2-0.0\n\nLees Carpet\n\n790.0\n\n425.03\n\n235.0 (30%)\n\nGlasgow Regional STP\n\n130.0\n\nBuffalo River\n\n2-7\n\nE.L.\n\n9.6-0.0\n\nAmherst STP\n\n150.0\n\n120.0\n\n30.0 (20%)\n\nRockfish River\n\n2-6\n\nE.L.\n\n9.5-0.0\n\nSchuyler STP\n\n110.0\n\n25.0\n\n85.0 (77%)\n\nStandardsville Run\n\nE.L.\n\nStandardsville\n\nLand Application Recommended\n\nSouth Fork Appomattox River\n\nE.L.\n\nAppomattox Lagoon\n\nConnect to Recommended Facility in Roanoke River Basin\n\nBuffalo Creek\n\n2-17\n\nE.L.\n\n9.3-7.7\n\nHampden-Sydney College\n\n46.0\n\n23.0\n\n23.0 (50%)\n\nUnnamed tributary of Tear Wallet Creek\n\nE.L.\n\nCumberland Courthouse\n\nLand Application Recommended\n\nCourthouse Branch\n\nE.L.\n\nAmelia\n\nLand Application Recommended\n\nDeep Creek\n\n2-17\n\nE.L.\n\n25.0-12.8\n\nCrewe STP\n\n69.0\n\n55.0\n\n14.0 (20%)\n\nNotes:\n\n1 Recommended classification.\n\n2 Based on 2020 loads or stream assimilative capacity less 20%.\n\n3 Load allocation based on published NPDES permit.\n\n4 Percentages refer to reserve as percent of total assimilative capacity. Minimum reserve for future growth and modeling accuracy is 20% unless otherwise noted.\n\n5 Assimilative capacity will be determined upon completion of the ongoing study by Hydroscience, Inc.\n\nSource: Wiley \u0026 Wilson, Inc.\n\nTABLE B4 - SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION UPPER JAMES-JACKSON RIVER SUBAREA\n\nStream Name\n\nSegment Number\n\nMile to Mile\n\nStream Classification\n\nComments\n\nBack Creek\n\n2-1\n\n16.06-8.46\n\nW.Q.\n\nMain Only\n\nJackson River\n\n2-1\n\n95.70-24.90\n\nE.L.\n\nMain and Tributaries\n\nJackson River\n\n2-2\n\n24.90-0.00\n\nW.Q.\n\nMain Only\n\nJackson River\n\n2-2\n\n24.90-0.00\n\nE.L.\n\nTributaries Only\n\nJames River\n\n2-3\n\n349.50-308.50\n\nE.L.\n\nMain and Tributaries\n\nJames River\n\n2-3\n\n308.50-279.41\n\nE.L.\n\nMain and Tributaries\n\nTABLE B5 - UPPER JAMES-JACKSON RIVER SUBAREA WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS BASED ON EXISTING DISCHARGE POINT1\n\nMAP LOCATION\n\nSTREAM NAME\n\nSEGMENT NUMBER\n\nSEGMENT CLASSIFICATION STANDARDS\n\nMILE to2 MILE\n\nDISCHARGER\n\nVPDES PERMIT NUMBER\n\nVPDES PERMIT LIMITS BOD5 kg/day\n\n303(e)3 WASTELOAD ALLOCATION BOD5 kg/day\n\n1\n\nJackson River\n\n2-1\n\nE.L.\n\n93.05-\n\nVirginia Trout\n\nVA0071722\n\nN/A\n\nSecondary\n\nB\n\nWarm Springs Run\n\n2-1\n\nE.L.\n\n3.62-0.00\n\nWarm Springs STP\n\nVA0028233\n\n9.10\n\nSecondary\n\n3\n\nBack Creek\n\n2-1\n\nW.Q.\n\n16.06-8.46\n\nVEPCO\n\nVA0053317\n\n11.50\n\n11.50\n\nC\n\nX-trib to Jackson River\n\n2-1\n\nE.L.\n\n0.40-0.0\n\nBacova\n\nVA0024091\n\n9.10\n\nSecondary\n\nD\n\nHot Springs Run\n\n2-1\n\nE.L.\n\n5.30-0.00\n\nHot Springs Reg. STP\n\nVA0066303\n\n51.10\n\nSecondary\n\nE\n\nX-trib to Cascades Creek\n\n2-1\n\nE.L.\n\n3.00-0.00\n\nAshwood-Healing Springs STP\n\nVA0023726\n\n11.30\n\nSecondary\n\nF\n\nJackson River\n\n2-1\n\nE.L.\n\n50.36-\n\nU.S. Forest Service Bolar Mountain\n\nVA0032123\n\n1.98\n\nSecondary\n\nG\n\nJackson River\n\n2-1\n\nE.L.\n\n43.55\n\nU.S. Army COE Morris Hill Complex\n\nVA0032115\n\n1.70\n\nSecondary\n\nH\n\nJackson River\n\n2-1\n\nE.L.\n\n29.84-\n\nAlleghany County Clearwater Park\n\nVA0027955\n\n5.70\n\nSecondary\n\n4\n\nJackson River\n\n2-1\n\nE.L.\n\n25.99\n\nCovington City Water Treatment Plant\n\nVA0058491\n\nN/A\n\nSecondary\n\n5\n\nJackson River\n\n2-2\n\nW.Q.\n\n24.64-19.03\n\nWestvaco\n\nVA0003646\n\n4,195.00\n\n4,195.004\n\n6\n\nCovington City5 Asphalt Plant\n\nVA0054411\n\nN/A\n\nN/A\n\n7\n\nHercules, Inc6\n\nVA0003450\n\n94.00\n\n94.00\n\nJ\n\nJackson River\n\n2-2\n\nW.Q.\n\n19.03-10.5\n\nCovington STP\n\nVA0025542\n\n341.00\n\n341.00\n\nK\n\nJackson River\n\n10.5-0.0\n\nLow Moor STP7\n\nVA0027979\n\n22.70\n\n22.70\n\nM\n\nD.S. Lancaster CC8\n\nVA0028509\n\n3.60\n\n3.60\n\nL\n\nSelma STP9\n\nVA0028002\n\n59.00\n\n59.00\n\n10\n\nThe Chessie System10\n\nVA0003344\n\nN/A\n\nN/A\n\nN\n\nClifton Forge STP11\n\nVA0002984\n\n227.00\n\n227.00\n\n11\n\nLydall12\n\nVA0002984\n\n6.00\n\n6.00\n\nP\n\nIron Gate STP13\n\nVA0020541\n\n60.00\n\n60.00\n\n8\n\nPaint Bank Branch\n\n2-2\n\nE.L.\n\n1.52\n\nVDGIF Paint Bank Hatchery\n\nVA0098432\n\nN/A\n\nSecondary\n\nI\n\nJerrys Run\n\n2-2\n\nE.L.\n\n6.72-\n\nVDOT 1-64 Rest Area\n\nVA0023159\n\n0.54\n\nSecondary\n\nAA\n\nEast Branch (Sulfer Spring)\n\n2-2\n\nE.L.\n\n2.16\n\nNorman F. Nicholas\n\nVA0078403\n\n0.05\n\nSecondary\n\nBB\n\nEast Branch (Sulfer Spring)\n\n2-2\n\nE.L.\n\n1.91-\n\nDaryl C. Clark\n\nVA0067890\n\n0.068\n\nSecondary\n\n9\n\nSmith Creek\n\n2-2\n\nE.L.\n\n3.44-\n\nClifton Forge Water Treatment Plant\n\nVA0006076\n\nN/A\n\nSecondary\n\nO\n\nWilson Creek\n\n2-2\n\nE.L.\n\n0.20-0.0\n\nCliftondale14 Park STP\n\nVA0027987\n\n24.00\n\nSecondary\n\n2\n\nPheasanty Run\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n0.01-\n\nCoursey Springs\n\nVA0006491\n\n434.90\n\nSecondary\n\nQ\n\nGrannys Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n1.20-\n\nCraig Spring Conference Grounds\n\nVA0027952\n\n3.40\n\nSecondary\n\nCC\n\nX-trib to Big Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n1.10-\n\nHomer Kelly Residence\n\nVA0074926\n\n0.05\n\nSecondary\n\n12\n\nMill Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n0.16-\n\nColumbia Gas Transmission Corp.\n\nVA0004839\n\nN/A\n\nSecondary\n\nR\n\nJohn Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n0.20-\n\nNew Castle STP (old)\n\nVA0024139\n\n21.00\n\nSecondary\n\nS\n\nCraig Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n48.45-36.0\n\nNew Castle STP (new)\n\nVA0064599\n\n19.90\n\nSecondary\n\nT\n\nCraig Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n46.98-\n\nCraig County Schools McCleary E.S.\n\nVA0027758\n\n0.57\n\nSecondary\n\nDD\n\nEagle Rock Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n0.08-\n\nEagle Rock STP15 (Proposed)\n\nVA0076350\n\n2.30\n\nSecondary\n\nU\n\nX-trib to Catawba Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n0.16\n\nVDBHDS Catawba Hospital\n\nVA0029475\n\n13.60\n\nSecondary\n\n14\n\nCatawba Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n23.84\n\nTarmac-Lonestar\n\nVA0078393\n\n0.80\n\nSecondary\n\nFF\n\nBorden Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n2.00-\n\nShenandoah Baptist Church Camp\n\nVA0075451\n\n0.88\n\nSecondary\n\nEE\n\nX-trib to Borden Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n0.36\n\nDavid B. Pope\n\nVA0076031\n\n0.07\n\nSecondary\n\nV\n\nX-trib to Catawba Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n3.21-\n\nU.S. FHA Flatwood Acres\n\nVA0068233\n\n0.03\n\nSecondary\n\nW\n\nCatawba Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n11.54-\n\nFincastle STP\n\nVA0060364\n\n8.50\n\nSecondary\n\nX\n\nLooney Mill Creek\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n1.83-\n\nVDOT I-81 Rest Area\n\nVA0023141\n\n0.91\n\nSecondary\n\nY\n\nX-trib to Stoney\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n0.57\n\nVDOC Field Unit No. 25 Battle Creek\n\nVA0023523\n\n1.10\n\nSecondary\n\nZ\n\nJames River\n\n2-3\n\nE.L.\n\n308.5-286.0\n\nBuchanan STP\n\nVA0022225\n\n27.00\n\nSecondary\n\nNotes:\n\nN/A Currently No BOD5 limits or wasteload have been imposed by the VPDES permit. Should BOD5 limits (wasteload) be imposed a WQMP amendment would be required for water quality limited segments only.\n\n1 Secondary treatment levels are required in effluent limiting (E.L.) segments. In water quality limiting (W.Q.) segments quantities listed represent wasteload allocations.\n\n2 Ending river miles have not been determined for some effluent limited segments.\n\n3 These allocations represent current and original (1977 WQMP) modeling. Future revisions may be necessary based on Virginia State Water Control Board modeling.\n\n4 The total assimilative capacity at critical stream flow for this portion of Segment 2-2 has been modeled and verified by Hydroscience, Inc. (March 1977) to be 4,914 kg/day BOD5.\n\n5 The discharge is to an unnamed tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 22.93.\n\n6 The discharge is at Jackson River mile 19.22.\n\n7 The discharge is to the mouth of Karnes Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 5.44.\n\n8 The discharge is at Jackson River mile 6.67.\n\n9 The discharge is at Jackson River mile 5.14.\n\n10 The discharge is at Jackson River mile 4.72.\n\n11 The discharge is at Jackson River mile 3.46.\n\n12 The discharge is at Jackson River mile 1.17.\n\n13 The discharge is at Jackson River mile 0.76.\n\n14 The discharge is to the mouth of Wilson Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 2.44.\n\n15 The discharge is to the mouth of Eagle Rock Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 330.35.\n\nTABLE B6 - RICHMOND CRATER INTERIM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS - JAMES RIVER BASIN\n\nSEGMENT\n\nSEGMENT NUMBER\n\nMILE TO MILE\n\nCLASSIFICATION\n\nUSGS HUC02080206 James River\n\n2-19\n\n115.0-60.5\n\nW.Q.\n\nUSGS HUC02080207 Appomattox\n\n2-23\n\n30.1-0.0\n\nW.Q.\n\nNotes:\n\nA new stream segment classification for the Upper James River Basin was adopted in 1981. The SWCB will renumber or realign these segments in the future to reflect these changes. This Plan covers only a portion of these segments.\n\nTABLE B7 - RICHMOND CRATER INTERIM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN – CURRENT PERMITTED WASTELOADS (March 1988)\n\nSUMMER (June-October)\n\nWINTER (November-May)\n\nFLOW (mgd)\n\nBOD5\n\nNH3-N1\n\nDO2 (mg/l)\n\nFLOW (mgd)\n\nBOD5\n\nNH3-N1\n\nDO2 (mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\nCity of Richmond STP3\n\n45.00\n\n3002\n\n8.0\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n45.00\n\n5367\n\n14.3\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n-\n\n-\n\nE.I. DuPont-Spruance\n\n8.68\n\n936\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n8.68\n\n936\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\nFalling Creek STP\n\n9.00\n\n1202\n\n16.0\n\n-\n\n-\n\n5.9\n\n9.00\n\n2253\n\n30.0\n\n-\n\n-\n\n5.9\n\nProctor's Creek STP\n\n6.40\n\n1601\n\n30.0\n\n-\n\n-\n\n5.9\n\n11.80\n\n2952\n\n30.0\n\n-\n\n-\n\n5.9\n\nReynolds Metals Company\n\n0.39\n\n138\n\n-\n\n7\n\n-\n\n-\n\n0.39\n\n138\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\nHenrico STP\n\n30.00\n\n3005\n\n12.0\n\n-\n\n-\n\n5.9\n\n30.00\n\n7260\n\n29.0\n\n7\n\n-\n\n5.9\n\nAmerican Tobacco Company\n\n1.94\n\n715\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n1.94\n\n716\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\nICI Americas, Inc.\n\n0.20\n\n152\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n0.20\n\n152\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\nPhillip Morris-Park 500\n\n1.50\n\n559\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n1.50\n\n557\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\nAllied (Chesterfield)\n\n51.00\n\n1207\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n51.00\n\n1207\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\nAllied (Hopewell)\n\n150.00\n\n2500\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n150.00\n\n2500\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\nHopewell Regional WTF\n\n34.08\n\n12507\n\n44.0\n\n-\n\n-\n\n4.8\n\n34.08\n\n12507\n\n44.0\n\n-\n\n-\n\n4.8\n\nPetersburg STP\n\n15.00\n\n2804\n\n22.4\n\n-\n\n-\n\n5.0\n\n15.00\n\n2804\n\n22.4\n\n-\n\n-\n\n5.0\n\nTOTAL\n\n353.19\n\n30328\n\n358.59\n\n39349\n\n-\n\nNotes:\n\n1 NH3-N values represent ammonia as nitrogen.\n\n2 Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels.\n\n3 Richmond STP's BOD5 is permitted as CBOD5\n\nTABLE B7 - WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS FOR THE YEAR 1990\n\nSUMMER (June-October)\n\nWINTER (November-May)\n\nFLOW (mgd)\n\nCBOD5\n\nNH3-N1,3\n\nDO2 (mg/l)\n\nCBOD5\n\nNH3-N1\n\nDO2 (mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\nCity of Richmond STP\n\n45.00\n\n3002\n\n8.0\n\n2403\n\n6.4\n\n5.6\n\n5367\n\n14.3\n\n5707\n\n15.2\n\n5.6\n\nE.I. DuPont-Spruance\n\n11.05\n\n948\n\n590\n\n4.4\n\n948\n\n756\n\n2.9\n\nFalling Creek STP\n\n10.10\n\n1348\n\n16.0\n\n539\n\n6.4\n\n5.9\n\n2023\n\n24.0\n\n1281\n\n15.2\n\n5.9\n\nProctor's Creek STP\n\n12.00\n\n1602\n\n16.0\n\n961\n\n9.6\n\n5.9\n\n2403\n\n24.0\n\n1402\n\n14.0\n\n5.9\n\nReynolds Metals Co.\n\n0.49\n\n172\n\n8\n\n6.5\n\n172\n\n8\n\n6.5\n\nHenrico STP\n\n30.00\n\n3002\n\n12.0\n\n2403\n\n9.6\n\n5.6\n\n4756\n\n19.0\n\n3504\n\n44.0\n\n5.6\n\nAmerican Tobacco Co.\n\n2.70\n\n715\n\n113\n\n5.8\n\n715\n\n113\n\n5.8\n\nICI Americas, Inc.\n\n0.20\n\n167\n\n8\n\n5.8\n\n167\n\n8\n\n3.1\n\nPhillip Morris-Park 500\n\n2.20\n\n819\n\n92\n\n4.6\n\n819\n\n92\n\n4.6\n\nAllied (Chesterfield)\n\n53.00\n\n1255\n\n442\n\n5.7\n\n1255\n\n442\n\n5.7\n\nAllied (Hopewell)\n\n165.00\n\n2750\n\n10326\n\n6.1\n\n2750\n\n10326\n\n6.1\n\nHopewell Regional WTF\n\n34.07\n\n12502\n\n44.0\n\n12091\n\n36.2\n\n4.8\n\n12502\n\n44.0\n\n10291\n\n36.2\n\n4.8\n\nPetersburg STP\n\n15.00\n\n2802\n\n22.4\n\n801\n\n6.4\n\n5.0\n\n2802\n\n22.4\n\n2028\n\n16.2\n\n5.0\n\nTOTAL\n\n380.81\n\n31084\n\n28978\n\n36679\n\n35958\n\nNotes:\n\n1 NH3-N values represent ammonia as nitrogen.\n\n2 Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels.\n\n3 Allied (Hopewell) allocation may be redistributed to the Hopewell Regional WTF by VPDES permit.\n\nTABLE B7 - WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS FOR THE YEAR 2010\n\nSUMMER (June-October)\n\nWINTER (November-May)\n\nFLOW (mgd)\n\nCBOD5\n\nNH3-N1,3\n\nDO2 (mg/l)\n\nCBOD5\n\nNH3-N1\n\nDO2 (mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\n(lbs/d)\n\n(mg/l)\n\nCity of Richmond STP\n\n45.86\n\n3002\n\n7.8\n\n2403\n\n6.3\n\n5.6\n\n5367\n\n14.0\n\n5707\n\n14.9\n\n5.6\n\nE.I. DuPont-Spruance\n\n16.99\n\n948\n\n590\n\n4.4\n\n948\n\n756\n\n2.9\n\nFalling Creek STP\n\n10.10\n\n1348\n\n16.0\n\n539\n\n6.4\n\n5.9\n\n2023\n\n24.0\n\n1281\n\n15.2\n\n5.9\n\nProctor's Creek STP\n\n24.00\n\n1602\n\n8.0\n\n961\n\n4.8\n\n5.9\n\n2403\n\n12.0\n\n1402\n\n7.0\n\n5.9\n\nReynolds Metals Co.\n\n0.78\n\n172\n\n13\n\n6.5\n\n172\n\n13\n\n6.5\n\nHenrico STP\n\n38.07\n\n3002\n\n9.5\n\n2403\n\n7.6\n\n5.6\n\n4756\n\n15.0\n\n3504\n\n11.0\n\n5.6\n\nAmerican Tobacco Co.\n\n3.00\n\n715\n\n113\n\n5.8\n\n715\n\n113\n\n5.8\n\nICI Americas, Inc.\n\n0.20\n\n167\n\n8\n\n5.8\n\n167\n\n8\n\n3.1\n\nPhillip Morris-Park 500\n\n2.90\n\n819\n\n92\n\n4.6\n\n819\n\n92\n\n4.6\n\nAllied (Chesterfield)\n\n56.00\n\n1255\n\n442\n\n5.7\n\n1255\n\n442\n\n5.7\n\nAllied (Hopewell)\n\n180.00\n\n2750\n\n10326\n\n6.1\n\n2750\n\n10326\n\n6.1\n\nHopewell Regional WTF\n\n39.61\n\n12502\n\n37.8\n\n10291\n\n31.1\n\n4.8\n\n12502\n\n37.8\n\n10291\n\n31.1\n\n4.8\n\nPetersburg STP\n\n15.00\n\n2802\n\n22.4\n\n801\n\n6.4\n\n5.0\n\n2802\n\n22.4\n\n2028\n\n16.2\n\n5.0\n\nTOTAL\n\n432.1\n\n31084\n\n28982\n\n36679\n\n35963\n\nNotes:\n\n1 NH3-N values represent ammonia as nitrogen.\n\n2 Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels.\n\n3 Allied (Hopewell) allocation may be redistributed to the Hopewell Regional WTF by VPDES permit.\n\nC. Nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers.\n\nThe following table presents nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations for the identified significant dischargers and the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the listed facilities.\n\nVirginia Waterbody ID\n\nDischarger Name\n\nVPDES Permit No.\n\nTotal Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)\n\nTotal Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)\n\nI37R\n\nBuena Vista STP\n\nVA0020991\n\n41,115\n\n2,778\n\nI09R\n\nCovington STP\n\nVA0025542\n\n54,820\n\n3,705\n\nH02R\n\nGeorgia Pacific\n\nVA0003026\n\n122,489\n\n40,273\n\nI37R\n\nMohawk Industries, Inc.\n\nVA0004677\n\n30,456\n\n9,880\n\nI35R\n\nLexington-Rockbridge WQCF\n\nVA0088161\n\n54,820\n\n3,705\n\nI09R\n\nLow Moor STP\n\nVA0027979\n\n9,137\n\n617\n\nI09R\n\nLower Jackson River STP\n\nVA0090671\n\n47,516\n\n3,211\n\nI09R\n\nNutrient Offset Fund\n\nFormerly VA0090671\n\n16,441\n\n1,112\n\nI04R\n\nWestRock Virginia LLC - Covington\n\nVA0003646\n\n394,400\n\n96,711\n\nH12R\n\nAmherst STP\n\nVA0031321\n\n10,964\n\n741\n\nH05R\n\nBWX Technologies Inc.\n\nVA0003697\n\n187,000\n\n1,235\n\nH05R\n\nGreif Inc.\n\nVA0006408\n\n73,246\n\n24,082\n\nH31R\n\nLake Monticello WWTP\n\nVA0024945\n\n14,164\n\n957\n\nH31R\n\nNutrient Offset Fund\n\nFormerly VA0024945\n\n4,018\n\n272\n\nH05R\n\nLynchburg STP1\n\nVA0024970\n\n536,019\n\n27,169\n\nH28R\n\nMoores Creek Advanced WRRF 8\n\nVA0025518\n\n282,994 [\n\n19,637 [\n\nH38R\n\nPowhatan CC STP\n\nVA0020699\n\n8,588\n\n581\n\nJ11R\n\nCrewe WWTP\n\nVA0020303\n\n9,137\n\n617\n\nJ01R\n\nFarmville WWTP\n\nVA0083135\n\n43,856\n\n2,964\n\nG02E\n\nNutrient Offset Fund\n\nFormerly VA0002780\n\n25,583\n\n768\n\nG01E\n\nE I du Pont - Spruance\n\nVA0004669\n\n201,080\n\n6,339\n\nG01E\n\nFalling Creek WWTP\n\nVA0024996\n\n182,738\n\n6,153\n\nG01E\n\nHenrico County WWTP\n\nVA0063690\n\n1,142,085\n\n45,689\n\nG03E\n\nAdvanSix Resins and Chemicals LLC\n\nVA0005291\n\n1,090,798\n\n40,541\n\nG03R\n\nHopewell WWTP\n\nVA0066630\n\n1,827,336\n\n30,459\n\nG15E\n\nHRSD – Boat Harbor STP\n\nVA0081256\n\n473,524\n\n304,5933\n\n43,175\n\n38,0743\n\n30,4594\n\n22,8445\n\nG11E\n\nHRSD – James River STP\n\nVA0081272\n\n378,819\n\n243,6743\n\n34,540\n\n30,4593\n\n24,3674\n\n18,2765\n\nG10E\n\nHRSD – Williamsburg STP\n\nVA0081302\n\n426,171\n\n274,1333\n\n38,858\n\n34,2673\n\n27,4134\n\n20,5605\n\nG02E\n\nPhilip Morris – Park 500\n\nVA0026557\n\n139,724\n\n1,060\n\nG01E\n\nProctors Creek WWTP\n\nVA0060194\n\n411,151\n\n16,448\n\nG01E\n\nRichmond WWTP1\n\nVA0063177\n\n1,096,402\n\n27,413\n\nG02E\n\nDominion-Chesterfield2\n\nVA0004146\n\n243,099\n\n170\n\nJ15R\n\nSouth Central WW Authority\n\nVA0025437\n\n350,239\n\n14,011\n\nG05R\n\nTyson Foods – Glen Allen\n\nVA0004031\n\n19,552\n\n424\n\nG11E\n\nHRSD – Nansemond STP\n\nVA0081299\n\n568,228\n\n365,5113\n\n45,6893\n\n51,811\n\n36,5514\n\n27,4135\n\nG15E\n\nHRSD – Army Base STP\n\nVA0081230\n\n340,937\n\n219,3073\n\n31,086\n\n27,4133\n\n21,9314\n\n16,4485\n\nG15E\n\nHRSD – VIP WWTP\n\nVA0081281\n\n757,638\n\n487,3483\n\n69,081\n\n60,9193\n\n48,7354\n\n36,5515\n\nG15E\n\nHRSD – JH Miles\n\nVA0003263\n\n153,500\n\n17,437\n\nC07E\n\nHRSD – Ches.-Elizabeth STP\n\nVA0081264\n\n1,100,000\n\n454,5966,7\n\n41,448 7\n\nG01E\n\nNutrient Offset Fund\n\nFormerly Tranlin/Vastly\n\n80,000\n\n0\n\nTOTALS\n\n12,949,784\n\n757,068\n\nNotes:\n\n1 Wasteload allocations for localities served by combined sewers are based on dry weather design flow capacity. During wet weather flow events the discharge shall achieve a TN concentration of 8.0 mg/l and a TP concentration of 1.0 mg/l.\n\n2 Dominion-Chesterfield wasteload allocations shall be transferred to the Nutrient Offset Fund on January 1, following the retirement of the last coal fired generating unit. 82,240 lbs/yr of TN WLA shall be held in reserve and may be made available by the department for an expansion of the Proctor's Creek WWTP provided that the expanded facility provides treatment to achieve an annual average TN concentration of 3.0 mg/l or less and the Falling Creek WWTP is designed to meet its individual TN WLA.\n\n3 Effective January 1, 2026.\n\n4 Effective January 1, 2030.\n\n5 Effective January 1, 2032.\n\n6 Effective January 1, 2022.\n\n7 Effective January 1, 2026, the HRSD – Chesapeake-Elizabeth STP wasteload allocations for total nitrogen and total phosphorus are transferred to the Nutrient Offset Fund.\n\n8 The Moores Creek Advanced WRRF WLA includes 8,894 lbs/yr of total nitrogen and 1,112 lbs/yr of total phosphorus from the consolidation of the Camelot WWTP (VA0025488).","path":["Title 9. Environment","Agency 25. State Water Control Board","Chapter 720. Water Quality Management Planning Regulation"],"source_url":"https://law.lis.virginia.gov/admincode/title9/agency25/chapter720/section60/","current_through":"2026 Regular Session (effective July 1, 2026)","vintage":"","retrieved_at":"2026-09-14T04:49:22Z","sha256":"862f5c2ea213018399f6183ac7059db7b25abe4b167a81217f2f5a78bdad924b","source_id":"us-va-vac","stale":false,"prev":"us-va/9vac25-720-50","next":"us-va/9vac25-720-70"},"notice":"GroundRules: Original legal text. Not legal advice."}