KRS 218A.510: Factors to be considered in determining whether object is drug

paraphernalia.

In determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia, a court or other authority should

consider, in addition to all other logically relevant factors, the following:

(1) Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use;

(2) Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under

any state or federal law relating to any controlled substance;

(3) The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of KRS

218A.500(2), (3) or (4);

(4) The proximity of the object to controlled substances;

(5) The existence of any residue of controlled substances on the object;

(6) Direct or circumstantial evidenc e of the intent of an owner, or of anyone in control

of the object, to deliver it to persons whom he knows, or should reasonably know,

intend to use the object to facilitate a violation of KRS 218A.500(2), (3) or (4); the

innocence of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, as to a direct violation

of KRS 218A.500(2), (3) or (4) shall not prevent a finding that the object is

intended for use, or designed for use as drug paraphernalia;

(7) Instructions, oral or written, provided with the object concerning its use;

(8) Descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain or depict its use;

(9) National and local advertising concerning its use;

(10) The manner in which the object is displayed for sale;

(11) Whether the owner, or anyone in c ontrol of the object, is a legitimate supplier of

like or related items to the community, such as a licensed distributor or dealer of

tobacco products;

(12) Direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the object to the total sales

of the business enterprise;

(13) The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object in the community;

(14) Expert testimony concerning its use.