GroundRules
← Search the law
Nevada · Through 2025 session (NRS as revised 2026-08-25) · Newer source version available

NRS 133.170: Omission of child or grandchild presumed intentional; rights of child or grandchild if omission found unintentional.

Read at publisher ↗
Where this section sits in the code
  1. TITLE 12 — WILLS AND ESTATES OF DECEASED PERSONS
  2. CHAPTER 133 - WILLS
  3. KINDRED NOT MENTIONED IN WILL WHO SHARE IN ESTATE

When the child of a testator or the issue of a deceased child of a testator is omitted from the testator’s will, it must be presumed that the omission was intentional. Should the court find that the omission was unintentional, the child, or the issue of the deceased child, is entitled to the same share in the estate of the testator as if the testator had died intestate.

Collected 2026-09-03T05:51:32Z. Source file · JSON

Browse this collection