GroundRules
← Search the law
New York · Through 2026-09-11

N.Y. Civil Practice Law & Rules § 5304: Grounds for non-recognition

Read at publisher ↗
Where this section sits in the code
  1. Civil Practice Law & Rules
  2. Article 53. Recognition of Foreign Country Money Judgments

§ 5304. Grounds for non-recognition. (a) A court of this state may not

recognize a foreign country judgment if:

1. the judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does not

provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the

requirements of due process of law;

2. the foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over the

defendant; or

3. the foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject

matter.

(b) A court of this state need not recognize a foreign country

judgment if:

1. the defendant in the proceeding in the foreign court did not

receive notice of the proceeding in sufficient time to enable the

defendant to defend;

2. the judgment was obtained by fraud that deprived the losing party

of an adequate opportunity to present its case;

3. the judgment or the cause of action on which the judgment is based

is repugnant to the public policy of this state or of the United States;

4. the judgment conflicts with another final and conclusive judgment;

5. the proceeding in the foreign court was contrary to an agreement

between the parties under which the dispute in question was to be

determined otherwise than by a proceeding in that court;

6. in the case of jurisdiction based only on personal service, the

foreign court was a seriously inconvenient forum for the trial of the

action;

7. the judgment was rendered in circumstances that raise substantial

doubt about the integrity of the rendering courts with respect to the

judgment;

8. the specific proceeding in the foreign court leading to the

judgment was not compatible with the requirements of due process of law;

or

9. the cause of action resulted in a defamation judgment obtained in a

jurisdiction outside the United States, unless the court before which

the matter is brought sitting in this state first determines that the

defamation law applied in the foreign court's adjudication provided at

least as much protection for freedom of speech and press in that case as

would be provided by both the United States and New York constitutions.

(c) A party resisting recognition of a foreign country judgment has

the burden of establishing that a ground for non-recognition stated in

subdivision (a) or (b) of this section exists; provided that the party

seeking recognition shall bear the burden of establishing the adequate

protections for freedom of speech and press required as a condition to

recognition under paragraph nine of subdivision (b) of this section if

the party resisting recognition establishes that the judgment is for

defamation.

Collected 2026-09-14T19:32:44Z. Source file · JSON

Browse this collection