GroundRules
← Search the law
New York · Through 2026-09-11

N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law § 170.25: Divestiture of jurisdiction by indictment; removal of case to superior court at defendant's instance

Read at publisher ↗
Where this section sits in the code
  1. Criminal Procedure Law
  2. Part 2. The Principal Proceedings
  3. Title H. Preliminary Proceedings In Local Criminal Court
  4. Article 170. Proceedings Upon Information, Simplified Traffic Information, Prosecutor's Information and Misdemeanor Complaint From Arraignment to Plea

§ 170.25 Divestiture of jurisdiction by indictment; removal of case to

superior court at defendant's instance.

1. At any time before entry of a plea of guilty to or commencement of

a trial of a local criminal court accusatory instrument containing a

charge of misdemeanor, a superior court having jurisdiction to prosecute

such misdemeanor charge by indictment may, upon motion of the defendant

made upon notice to the district attorney, showing good cause to believe

that the interests of justice so require, order that such charge be

prosecuted by indictment and that the district attorney present it to

the grand jury for such purpose.

2. Such order stays the proceedings in the local criminal court

pending submission of the charge to the grand jury. Upon the subsequent

filing of an indictment in the superior court, the proceedings in the

local criminal court terminate and the defendant must be required to

appear for arraignment upon the indictment in the manner prescribed in

subdivisions one and two of section 210.10. Upon the subsequent filing

of a grand jury dismissal of the charge, the proceedings in the local

criminal court terminate and the superior court must, if the defendant

is not at liberty on his own recognizance, discharge him from custody or

exonerate his bail, as the case may be.

3. At any time before entry of a plea of guilty to or commencement of

a trial of or within thirty days of arraignment on an accusatory

instrument specified in subdivision one, whichever occurs first, the

defendant may apply to the local criminal court for an adjournment of

the proceedings therein upon the ground that he intends to make a motion

in a superior court, pursuant to subdivision one, for an order that the

misdemeanor charge be prosecuted by indictment. In such case, the local

criminal court must adjourn the proceedings to a date which affords the

defendant reasonable opportunity to pursue such action, and may

subsequently grant such further adjournments for that purpose as are

reasonable under the circumstances. Following the granting of such

adjournment or adjournments, the proceedings must be as follows:

(a) If a motion in a superior court is not made by the defendant

within the designated period, the proceedings in the local criminal

court must continue.

(b) If a motion in a superior court is made by the defendant within

the designated period, such motion stays the proceedings in the local

criminal court until the entry of an order determining such motion.

(c) If the superior court enters an order granting the motion, such

order stays the proceedings in the local criminal court as provided in

subdivision two; and upon a subsequent indictment or dismissal of such

charge by the grand jury, the proceedings in the local criminal court

terminate as provided in subdivision two.

(d) If the superior court enters an order denying the motion, the

proceedings in the local criminal court must continue.

4. Upon application of a defendant who on the basis of an order

issued by a superior court pursuant to subdivision one is awaiting grand

jury action, and who, at the time of such order or subsequent thereto,

has been committed to the custody of the sheriff pending grand jury

action, and who has been confined in such custody for a period of more

than forty-five days without the occurrence of any grand jury action or

disposition, the superior court which issued such order must release him

on his own recognizance unless:

(a) The lack of a grand jury disposition during such period of

confinement was due to the defendant's request, action or condition, or

occurred with his consent; or

(b) The people have shown good cause why such order of release should

not be issued. Such good cause must consist of some compelling fact or

circumstance which precluded grand jury action within the prescribed

period or rendered the same against the interest of justice.

Collected 2026-09-14T19:32:44Z. Source file · JSON

Browse this collection