N.Y. Family Court Act § 343.3: Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous recognition in absence of present identification

§ 343.3. Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous

recognition in absence of present identification. 1. In any juvenile

delinquency proceeding in which the respondent's commission of a crime

is in issue, testimony as provided in subdivision two may be given by a

witness when:

(a) such witness testifies that:

(i) he or she observed the person claimed by the presentment agency to

be the respondent either at the time and place of the commission of the

crime or upon some other occasion relevant to the case; and

(ii) on a subsequent occasion he or she observed, under circumstances

consistent with such rights as an accused person may derive under the

constitution of this state or of the United States, a person, or, where

the observation is made pursuant to a blind or blinded procedure as

defined herein, a pictorial, photographic, electronic, filmed or video

recorded reproduction of a person whom he or she recognized as the same

person whom he or she had observed on the first incriminating occasion;

and

(iii) he or she is unable at the proceeding to state, on the basis of

present recollection, whether or not the respondent is the person in

question; and

(b) it is established that the respondent is in fact the person whom

the witness observed and recognized or whose pictorial, photographic,

electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction the witness observed

and recognized on the second occasion. Such fact may be established by

testimony of another person or persons to whom the witness promptly

declared his or her recognition on such occasion and by such pictorial,

photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction.

(c) For purposes of this section, a "blind or blinded procedure" is

one in which the witness identifies a person in an array of pictorial,

photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded reproductions under

circumstances where, at the time the identification is made, the public

servant administering such procedure: (i) does not know which person in

the array is the suspect, or (ii) does not know where the suspect is in

the array viewed by the witness. The failure of a public servant to

follow such a procedure shall be assessed solely for purposes of this

article and shall result in the preclusion of testimony regarding the

identification procedure as evidence in chief, but shall not constitute

a legal basis to suppress evidence made pursuant to subdivision six of

section 710.20 of the criminal procedure law. This article neither

limits not expands subdivision six of section 710.20 of the criminal

procedure law.

2. Under circumstances prescribed in subdivision one, such witness may

testify at the proceeding that the person whom he or she observed and

recognized or whose pictorial, photographic, electronic, filmed or video

recorded reproduction he or she observed and recognized on the second

occasion is the same person whom he or she observed on the first or

incriminating occasion. Such testimony, together with the evidence that

the respondent is in fact the person whom the witness observed and

recognized or whose pictorial, photographic, electronic, filmed or video

recorded reproduction he or she observed and recognized on the second

occasion, constitutes evidence in chief.