GroundRules
← Search the law
New York · Through 2026-09-11

N.Y. General Business Law § 1421: Transparency requirements

Read at publisher ↗
Where this section sits in the code
  1. General Business Law
  2. Article 44-B. Responsible Ai Safety and Education (raise) Act

* § 1421. Transparency requirements. 1. A large frontier developer

shall write, implement, comply with, and clearly and conspicuously

publish on its internet website a frontier AI framework that applies to

the large frontier developer's frontier models and describes in detail

how the large frontier developer handles all of the following:

(a) incorporating national standards, international standards, and

industry consensus best practices into its frontier AI framework;

(b) defining and assessing thresholds used by the large frontier

developer to identify and assess whether a frontier model has

capabilities that could pose a catastrophic risk, which may include

multiple-tiered thresholds;

(c) applying mitigations to address the potential for catastrophic

risks based on the results of assessments undertaken pursuant to

paragraph (b) of this subdivision;

(d) reviewing assessments and adequacy of mitigations as part of the

decision to deploy a frontier model or use it extensively internally;

(e) using third parties to assess the potential for catastrophic risks

and the effectiveness of mitigations of catastrophic risks;

(f) revisiting and updating the frontier AI framework, including any

criteria that trigger updates and how the large frontier developer

determines when its frontier models are substantially modified enough to

require disclosures pursuant to subdivision three of this section;

(g) cybersecurity practices to secure unreleased model weights from

unauthorized modification or transfer by internal or external parties;

(h) identifying and responding to critical safety incidents;

(i) instituting internal governance practices to ensure implementation

of these processes; and

(j) assessing and managing catastrophic risk resulting from the

internal use of its frontier models, including risks resulting from a

frontier model circumventing oversight mechanisms.

2. (a) A large frontier developer shall review and, as appropriate,

update its frontier AI framework at least once per year.

(b) If a large frontier developer makes a material modification to its

frontier AI framework, the large frontier developer shall clearly and

conspicuously publish the modified frontier AI framework and a

justification for that modification within thirty days.

3. (a) Before, or concurrently with, deploying a new frontier model or

a substantially modified version of an existing frontier model, a

frontier developer shall clearly and conspicuously publish on its

internet website a transparency report containing all of the following:

(i) the internet website of the frontier developer;

(ii) a mechanism that enables a natural person to communicate with the

frontier developer;

(iii) the release date of the frontier model;

(iv) the languages supported by the frontier model;

(v) the modalities of output supported by the frontier model;

(vi) the intended uses of the frontier model; and

(vii) any generally applicable restrictions or conditions on uses of

the frontier model.

(b) Before, or concurrently with, deploying a new frontier model or a

substantially modified version of an existing frontier model, a large

frontier developer shall include in the transparency report required by

paragraph (a) of this subdivision, summaries of all of the following:

(i) assessments of catastrophic risks from the frontier model

conducted pursuant to the large frontier developer's frontier AI

framework;

(ii) the results of the assessments under subparagraph (i) of this

paragraph;

(iii) the extent to which third-party evaluators were involved; and

(iv) other steps taken to fulfill the requirements of the frontier AI

framework with respect to the frontier model.

(c) A frontier developer that publishes the information described in

paragraph (a) or (b) of this subdivision as part of a larger document,

including a system card or model card, shall be deemed in compliance

with the applicable paragraph.

4. (a) (i) A frontier developer shall not make a materially false or

misleading statement about catastrophic risk from its frontier models or

its management of catastrophic risk.

(ii) A large frontier developer shall not make a materially false or

misleading statement about its implementation of, or compliance with,

its frontier AI framework.

(b) This subdivision shall not apply to a statement that was made in

good faith and was reasonable under the circumstances.

5. (a) When a frontier developer publishes documents to comply with

this section, such frontier developer may make redactions to such

documents that are necessary to protect such frontier developer's trade

secrets, such frontier developer's cybersecurity, public safety, or the

national security of the United States or to comply with any federal or

state law.

(b) If a frontier developer redacts information in a document pursuant

to this subdivision, such frontier developer shall describe the

character and justification of such redaction in any published version

of such document to the extent permitted by the concerns that justify

redaction and shall retain the unredacted information for five years.

* NB Effective January 1, 2027

Collected 2026-09-14T19:32:44Z. Source file · JSON

Browse this collection