Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 43-113: Preference of child – Record of interview

A. In any action or proceeding in which a court must determine

custody or limits to or periods of visitation, the child may express

a preference as to which of the parents the child wishes to have

custody or limits to or periods of visitation.

B. The court shall first determine whether the best interest of

the child will be served by allowing the child to express a

preference as to which parent should have custody or limits to or

periods of visitation with either parent. If the court so finds,

then the child may express such preference or give other testimony.

C. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a child who is

twelve (12) years of age or older is of a sufficient age to form an

intelligent preference.

D. If the child is of a sufficient age to form an intelligent

preference, the court shall consider the expression of preference or

other testimony of the child in determining custody or limits to or

periods of visitation. Interviewing the child does not diminish the

discretion of the court in determining the best interest of the

child. The court shall not be bound by the child's choice or wishes

and shall take all factors into consideration in awarding custody or

limits of or period of visitation.

E. If the child is allowed to express a preference or give

testimony, the court may conduct a private interview with the child

in chambers without the parents, attorneys or other parties present.

However, if the court has appointed a guardian ad litem for the

child, the guardian ad litem shall be present with the child in

chambers. The parents, attorneys or other parties may provide the

court with questions or topics for the court to consider in its

interview of the child; however, the court shall not be bound to ask

any question presented or explore any topic requested by a parent,

attorney or other party.

F. At the request of either party, a record shall be made of

any child interview conducted in chambers. If the proceeding is

transcribed, the parties shall be entitled to access to the

transcript only if a parent or the parents appeal the custody or

visitation determination.