Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-2-432: Attachments of assets - Execution of judgment - Exempt

property - Property seized by forfeiture.

A. A plaintiff under the Drug Dealer Liability Act, subject to

subsection C of this section, may request an ex parte prejudgment

attachment order from the court against all assets of a defendant

sufficient to satisfy a potential award. If attachment is

instituted, a defendant is entitled to an immediate hearing.

Attachment may be lifted if the defendant demonstrates that the

assets will be available for a potential award of if the defendant

posts a bond sufficient to cover a potential award.

B. A person against whom a judgment has been rendered under the

Drug Dealer Liability Act is not eligible to exempt any property, of

whatever kind, from process to levy or process to execute on the

judgment.

C. Any assets sought to satisfy a judgment under the Drug

Dealer Liability Act that are named in a forfeiture section or have

been seized for forfeiture by any state or federal agency may not be

used to satisfy a judgment unless and until the assets have been

released following the conclusion of the forfeiture action or

released by the agency that seized the assets.